William T. Barndt
September 2005
Princeton University
## email not listed ##
Please do not cite or circulate without author permission.
43
Table 10: Coding Rules (see text for summary)
Support
1. At least one significant institution of the state security forces supports the
assault
2. There is no open or veiled opposition by any other significant institution
Oppose
1. At least one significant institution of the state security forces opposes the
assault
2. There is no open or veiled support by any other significant institution
Divided
1. Different institutions take different positions on the assault
State Security
Forces
Uninvolved
1. No institutions are involved in the assault (silence or neutrality)
Support
1. At least one significant state legal institution supports the outcome
2. No significant state legal institution opposes or is divided over the outcome
Oppose
1. No significant state legal institution supports or is divided over outcome
2. At least one significant state legal institution opposes the outcome
Divided
1. Different institutions take different positions on the assault
The Law
Uninvolved
1. No institutions are involved in the assault (silence or neutrality)
Support
1. Significant associations from at least two of the following five sectors
support the assault (industry, commerce, agriculture, finance, information).
2. No significant association from these sectors opposes the assault
Oppose
1. Significant associations from at least two of the five sectors oppose the
assault.
2. No significant association from these sectors supports the assault
Divided
1. Associations from different sectors take different positions on assault.
Business
Uninvolved
1. Associations from one or fewer sectors take a position on the assault or
those taking positions take a position of neutrality
Support
1. Significant associations from two of the following three sectors support
the assault (indigenous, urban working class, transportation).
2. No significant association from any of these sectors opposes the assault
Oppose
1. Significant associations from two of the three three sectors oppose the
assault
2. No significant association from any of these sectors supports the assault
Divided
1. Associations from different sectors take different positions on assault.
Property-less
Uninvolved
1. Associations from one or fewer sectors take a position on the assault or
those taking positions take position of neutrality
Support
1. Significant associations from two of the following four sectors support
the assault: Academia/Students, Church, International NGOs, Domestic
NGOs)
2. No significant associations from these sectors oppose the assault.
Oppose
1. Significant associations from two of these four sectors oppose the assault.
2. No significant associations from these sectors support the assault.
Divided
1. Associations from different sectors take different positions on assault.
Human Rights
Networks
Uninvolved
1. Associations from one or fewer sectors take a position on the assault or
those taking positions take position of neutrality
Support
1. Significant associations from two of the following three sectors support
the assault (media owners, journalists, media NGOs).
2. No significant association from these sectors oppose the assault.
Oppose
1. Significant associations from two of the three sectors oppose the assault.
2. No significant association from these sectors support the assault.
Divided
1. Associations from different sectors take different positions on assault.
The Media
Uninvolved
1. Associations from one or fewer sectors take a position on the assault or
those taking positions take position of neutrality
Convention