|
|
|
|
Gender, Nation, Religion: The Discursive Construction of Identities in India's Democracy, 1952-1956 |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Current social science holds that identities are socially constructed. Yet the insights of constructivism still have to be operationalized. Most political science studies have taken identities (whether ethnic, national, gendered, or otherwise) as independent variables, and used them to explain political outcomes. This paper reverses the causal arrow and contends that constructivism tells us that identities themselves require explanation. Accordingly, it takes identities and identity construction as dependent variables, and tries to explain how a given set of identities was constructed in one particular spatial and temporal context. Specifically, the paper examines how religious, gender, and national identities were discursively constructed in early postcolonial India, by examining legislative debates over the reform and codification of Hindu family law in the 1950s. Two key conclusions emerged from the analysis. First, the discursive construction of these different forms of identity was highly interconnected: the construction of religion and nationalism could not be understood without gender; nor could the impact of nationalism on religion and gender be captured by studying any of them in isolation. Both Hindu socio-religious tradition and secular Indian nationalism were gendered constructs: gender was constitutive of religious and national identity in this time period. Second, political factors were central to how these discursive identities were constructed, at least at three levels: the democratic political system; the state; and individual leadership. Accordingly, I suggest that identities are not just socially but politically constructed; and as such, unraveling and explaining these processes is a critical task for political science. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
women (131), nation (128), hindu (128), construct (114), law (113), ident (107), gender (82), social (76), polit (69), person (66), right (65), hcb (64), religi (61), religion (56), indian (54), progress (53), tradit (42), differ (40), famili (40), bill (39), india (39), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Williams, Rina. "Gender, Nation, Religion: The Discursive Construction of Identities in India's Democracy, 1952-1956" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41853_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Williams, R. V. , 2005-09-01 "Gender, Nation, Religion: The Discursive Construction of Identities in India's Democracy, 1952-1956" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41853_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Current social science holds that identities are socially constructed. Yet the insights of constructivism still have to be operationalized. Most political science studies have taken identities (whether ethnic, national, gendered, or otherwise) as independent variables, and used them to explain political outcomes. This paper reverses the causal arrow and contends that constructivism tells us that identities themselves require explanation. Accordingly, it takes identities and identity construction as dependent variables, and tries to explain how a given set of identities was constructed in one particular spatial and temporal context. Specifically, the paper examines how religious, gender, and national identities were discursively constructed in early postcolonial India, by examining legislative debates over the reform and codification of Hindu family law in the 1950s. Two key conclusions emerged from the analysis. First, the discursive construction of these different forms of identity was highly interconnected: the construction of religion and nationalism could not be understood without gender; nor could the impact of nationalism on religion and gender be captured by studying any of them in isolation. Both Hindu socio-religious tradition and secular Indian nationalism were gendered constructs: gender was constitutive of religious and national identity in this time period. Second, political factors were central to how these discursive identities were constructed, at least at three levels: the democratic political system; the state; and individual leadership. Accordingly, I suggest that identities are not just socially but politically constructed; and as such, unraveling and explaining these processes is a critical task for political science. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
20 |
| Word count: |
12236 |
| Text sample: |
| 1 Gender Nation Religion: The Discursive Construction of Identities in India’s Democracy 1952-1956 Rina Verma Williams University of Virginia Prepared for delivery at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association September 1 - September 4 2005. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. 2 Gender Nation Religion: The Discursive Construction of Identities in India’s Democracy 1952-1956 Rina Verma Williams University of Virginia Abstract Current social science holds that identities are socially constructed. Yet the insights of |
| women of the village responded in ways that echoed the arguments of conservative opponents of the bills. They thought the provision of a share of inheritance would cause discord between brothers and sisters; and high-caste women were unlikely to use the provisions of divorce or those of absolute property rights. 94 Srimati Basu “Indian Women and Inheritance Law ” in Larson ed. 166-67. See for example: Srimati Basu She Comes to Take Her Rights: Indian Women Property and Propriety |
Similar Titles:
'Our Women': Construction of Hindu and Muslim Womens Identity within the Discourse of Religious Nationalism in India.
Womens Rights or Religious Rights? Religion, Law and the Historical Construction of Gender Inequality in India
Women's Rights or Religious Rights? Religion, Law, and the Historical Construction of Gender Inequality in India
|
|