|
|
|
|
Understanding Patrimonial Democracy |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
There is virtual consensus about the patrimonial character of states/regimes in Sub-Saharan Africa, and much discussion about the obstacles this presents to full democratization. There has been much less analysis of how patrimonial states/regimes have shaped democratic procedures and institutions since the "third wave" arrived upon African shores a decade and a half ago. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of 'patrimonial democracy,' exploring not how it might eventually lead to more liberal Western forms of governance but rather how it actually works. How are patrimonial democracies legitimized? How do they structure state-society, and society-society relations? Under what conditions are they more likely to consolidate, transition back to previous regime forms, or collapse into conflict? The paper sketches some preliminary answers to these questions, based upon a comparative analysis of Benin, Malawi and Congo-Brazzaville. Each of these countries experienced real political change with founding elections: incumbents were turned out of office. Each also has a traditional three-way ethnic/political divide, which provides an important control in the analysis. Despite these political and societal similarities, the three cases represent the range of possible values on the dependent variable: patrimonial democracy appears to have entered a consolidation phase in Benin; Malawi is reverting to a less democratic form of patrimonial rule; and the transition to patrimonial democracy in Congo-Brazzaville led to civil war and state collapse. The research question to be addressed in this paper is: why? To what extent can we identify structural explanations for divergent outcomes, and how much must be left to contingency? |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
parti (135), polit (121), democrat (98), elect (82), benin (63), democraci (62), region (62), malawi (57), state (54), rule (53), patrimoni (52), vote (49), regim (44), pp (42), support (41), transit (41), congo (40), africa (37), african (37), opposit (35), urban (35), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Lawson, Letitia. "Understanding Patrimonial Democracy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2011-03-14 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41889_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Lawson, L. , 2005-09-01 "Understanding Patrimonial Democracy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2011-03-14 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41889_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: There is virtual consensus about the patrimonial character of states/regimes in Sub-Saharan Africa, and much discussion about the obstacles this presents to full democratization. There has been much less analysis of how patrimonial states/regimes have shaped democratic procedures and institutions since the "third wave" arrived upon African shores a decade and a half ago. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of 'patrimonial democracy,' exploring not how it might eventually lead to more liberal Western forms of governance but rather how it actually works. How are patrimonial democracies legitimized? How do they structure state-society, and society-society relations? Under what conditions are they more likely to consolidate, transition back to previous regime forms, or collapse into conflict? The paper sketches some preliminary answers to these questions, based upon a comparative analysis of Benin, Malawi and Congo-Brazzaville. Each of these countries experienced real political change with founding elections: incumbents were turned out of office. Each also has a traditional three-way ethnic/political divide, which provides an important control in the analysis. Despite these political and societal similarities, the three cases represent the range of possible values on the dependent variable: patrimonial democracy appears to have entered a consolidation phase in Benin; Malawi is reverting to a less democratic form of patrimonial rule; and the transition to patrimonial democracy in Congo-Brazzaville led to civil war and state collapse. The research question to be addressed in this paper is: why? To what extent can we identify structural explanations for divergent outcomes, and how much must be left to contingency? |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
42 |
| Word count: |
12921 |
| Text sample: |
| Understanding Patrimonial Democracy Letitia Lawson Naval Postgraduate School PRELIMINARY DRAFT: NOT FOR CITATION Abstract There is virtual consensus about the patrimonial character of states/regimes in Sub- Saharan Africa and much discussion about the obstacles this presents to full democratization. There has been much less analysis of how patrimonial states/regimes have shaped democratic procedures and institutions since the "third wave" arrived upon African shores a decade and a half ago. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of 'patrimonial democracy ' |
| 491-504 van de Walle Nicolas 2003. "Presidentialism and Clientelism in Africa's Emergying Party Systems " Journal of Modern African Studies 41 2 pp. 297-332 Venter Denis 1995. "Malawi: The Transition to Multi-Party Politics " in John A. Wiseman (ed) Democracy and Political Change in Sub-Saharan Africa (NY: Routledge) pp. 152-192 Von Doepp Peter 2001. "The Survival of Malawi's Enfeebled Democracy " Current History 100 pp. 232-237 Wantchekon Leonard 2003. "Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in |
Similar Titles:
The Party’s Not Over Yet: Elections, Political Parties, and Democratization in the Postcommunist States
Running to vote and voting to run: the impact of competitive multi-party elections on human rights and democratization in Africa.
|
|