All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics
Unformatted Document Text:  Skocpol, T. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: the political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Skocpol, T., and M. Somers. 1980. The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22:174-197. Smelser, N. 1973. The methodology of comparative analysis. In Donald P. Warwick and Samuel Osherson, eds., Comparative Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Smelser, N. 1976. Comparative methods in the social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Swank, D. 2002. Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tarrow, S. G. 1994. Power in movement: social movements, collective actions, and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Thelen, K. 2003. How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis. Pp. 208-40 in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How institutions evolve: the political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tilly, C. 1990. Coercion, capital, and the European states, 990-1990 A.D. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell. Varshney, A. 2002. Waldner, D. 1999. State-building and late development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Weyland, K. 2002. The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Wickham-Crowley T. 1991. A qualitative comparative approach to Latin American revolutions. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 32: 82-109. Wickham-Crowley Timothy. 1992. Guerrillas and revolution in Latin America: a comparative study of insurgents and regimes since 1956. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 34

Authors: Mahoney, James.
first   previous   Page 34 of 34   next   last



background image
Skocpol, T. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: the political origins of social policy
in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Skocpol, T., and M. Somers. 1980. The uses of comparative history in macrosocial
inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22:174-197.
Smelser, N. 1973. The methodology of comparative analysis. In Donald P. Warwick and
Samuel Osherson, eds., Comparative Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall.
Smelser, N. 1976. Comparative methods in the social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall.
Swank, D. 2002. Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed
welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S. G. 1994. Power in movement: social movements, collective actions, and
politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, K. 2003. How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis.
Pp. 208-40 in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by
James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. Cambridge; Cambridge University
Press.
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How institutions evolve: the political economy of skills in
Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Tilly, C. 1990. Coercion, capital, and the European states, 990-1990 A.D. Cambridge,
Mass.: Blackwell.
Varshney, A. 2002.
Waldner, D. 1999. State-building and late development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Weyland, K. 2002. The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina,
Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wickham-Crowley T. 1991. A qualitative comparative approach to Latin American
revolutions. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 32: 82-109.
Wickham-Crowley Timothy. 1992. Guerrillas and revolution in Latin America: a
comparative study of insurgents and regimes since 1956. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
34


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 34 of 34   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.