All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

IGO Participation in Dyadic Disputes: Follow the Leader or Follow the Rules?
Unformatted Document Text:  Intergovernmental Organizations and International Conflict: Follow the Leader or Follow the Rules? * Michelle A. Benson Department of Political Science 520 Park Hall University at Buffalo, SUNY Buffalo, NY 14260 ## email not listed ## Abstract This paper asks why IGOs take action in international dyadic disputes. Three key determinants of action—organizational attributes, conflict attributes, and disputant attributes may each affect the likelihood of IGOs acting in international conflicts. In short, if the preferences of IGO members are primary in determining IGO action, then one would expect to see a relationship between the IGO member types and the target disputants of IGO action. However, if IGOs are driven by norms above and beyond the interests of the member states, then one would expect to see certain attributes of the conflict—such as duration, hostility level, and fatality level—as important motivators of IGO actions. Using PANDA data from 1984 to 1994, I code the level of IGO action for all dyadic disputes lasting longer than 24 hours. The cross tabulation, multinomial logits, and predicted probabilities suggest that intergovernmental organizations function as both norm generators and as venues to help states collaborate in action which supports the ir status quo preferences. * Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Conference, Washington, D.C., September 1-4, 2005. I would like to thank the Baldy Center for research support and Sooh-Rhee Ryu and Lisa Danish for their research assistance on this project.

Authors: Benson, Michelle.
first   previous   Page 1 of 36   next   last



background image
Intergovernmental Organizations and International Conflict:
Follow the Leader or Follow the Rules?
*
Michelle A. Benson
Department of Political Science
520 Park Hall
University at Buffalo, SUNY
Buffalo, NY 14260
## email not listed ##


Abstract
This paper asks why IGOs take action in international dyadic disputes. Three key
determinants of action—organizational attributes, conflict attributes, and disputant
attributes may each affect the likelihood of IGOs acting in international conflicts. In
short, if the preferences of IGO members are primary in determining IGO action, then
one would expect to see a relationship between the IGO member types and the target
disputants of IGO action. However, if IGOs are driven by norms above and beyond the
interests of the member states, then one would expect to see certain attributes of the
conflict—such as duration, hostility level, and fatality level—as important motivators of
IGO actions. Using PANDA data from 1984 to 1994, I code the level of IGO action for
all dyadic disputes lasting longer than 24 hours. The cross tabulation, multinomial logits,
and predicted probabilities suggest that intergovernmental organizations function as both
norm generators and as venues to help states collaborate in action which supports the ir
status quo preferences.




*
Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Conference, Washington,
D.C., September 1-4, 2005.
I would like to thank the Baldy Center for research support and Sooh-Rhee Ryu and Lisa Danish for their
research assistance on this project.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 36   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.