All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Voice of the People? Analyzing Letters to the Editor in North Carolina Newspapers
Unformatted Document Text:  8 Bibliography Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones, eds. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2005. “Policy Agendas Project Codebooks.” http://www.policyagendas.org/codebooks/topicindex.html . Accessed May 2, 2005. Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Foster, H. Schuyler, and Carl J. Friedrich. 1937. “Letters to the Editor as a Means of Measuring the Effectiveness of Propaganda.” The American Political Science Review 31(1): 71-79. Franklin, B., and J. Parry. 1998. “Old Habits Die Hard: Journalism’s Changing Professional Commitments and Local Newspaper Reporting of the 1997 General Election. In B. Franklin and D. Murphy (eds.) Making the Local News: Local Journalism in Context (pp. 209-227). London: Routledge. Grey, David L., and Trevor R. Brown. 1970. “Letters to the Editor: Hazy Reflections of Public Opinion.” Journalism Quarterly 47: 450-456. Herbst, Susan. 1998. Reading Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hynds, Ernest C. 1994. “Editors at Most U.S. Dailies See Vital Role for Editorial Page.” Journalism Quarterly 71(3): 573-582. Mooney, Christopher Z. 1991. “Information Sources in State Legislative Decision Making.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 445-56. Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Kenneth J. Meir. 2002. “Size Doesn’t Matter: In Defense of Single-State Studies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2: 411-22. Richardson, John E., and Bob Franklin. 2004. “Letters of Intent: Election Campaigning and Orchestrated Public Debate in Local Newspapers’ Letters to the Editor.” Political Communication 21: 459-478. Swers, Michelle L. 2004. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.

Authors: Knotts, Gibbs. and Cooper, Christopher.
first   previous   Page 9 of 20   next   last



background image
8
Bibliography
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones, eds. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2005. “Policy Agendas Project
Codebooks.”
http://www.policyagendas.org/codebooks/topicindex.html
. Accessed May 2,
2005.

Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of
Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.

Foster, H. Schuyler, and Carl J. Friedrich. 1937. “Letters to the Editor as a Means of
Measuring the Effectiveness of Propaganda.” The American Political Science
Review
31(1): 71-79.

Franklin, B., and J. Parry. 1998. “Old Habits Die Hard: Journalism’s Changing
Professional Commitments and Local Newspaper Reporting of the 1997 General
Election. In B. Franklin and D. Murphy (eds.) Making the Local News: Local
Journalism in Context
(pp. 209-227). London: Routledge.

Grey, David L., and Trevor R. Brown. 1970. “Letters to the Editor: Hazy Reflections of
Public Opinion.” Journalism Quarterly 47: 450-456.

Herbst, Susan. 1998. Reading Public Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hynds, Ernest C. 1994. “Editors at Most U.S. Dailies See Vital Role for Editorial Page.”
Journalism Quarterly 71(3): 573-582.

Mooney, Christopher Z. 1991. “Information Sources in State Legislative Decision
Making.”
Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 445-56.

Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Kenneth J. Meir. 2002. “Size Doesn’t Matter: In Defense
of Single-State Studies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2: 411-22.

Richardson, John E., and Bob Franklin. 2004. “Letters of Intent: Election Campaigning
and Orchestrated Public Debate in Local Newspapers’ Letters to the Editor.”
Political Communication 21: 459-478.

Swers, Michelle L. 2004. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in
Congress
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 20   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.