All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Ideology, Party and the Creation of the Anti-Slavery Coalition
Unformatted Document Text:  This paper is part of a larger project on the relationship between party and ideology. Time and again in American history, key issues or clusters of issues have changed their relationship to political parties. In the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, Republicans were the party of big government, whereas Democrats preferred local and state solutions to problems. But in the next century they changed sides. The parties have also juggled positions on trade restrictions. Specie-based currency, temperance, abortion policy and a host of other, major policies have aligned with the parties in different ways at different times. Extensive study of Congressional voting and electoral campaigns gives us a rich picture of party coalitions on these issues. But the positions taken by political intellectuals give us another, equally rich view. I argue that the work of ideological thinkers tends to drive the party changes. I test the argument by analyzing the issue preferences of intellectuals, beginning, in this paper, with the changes in the 1850s. This paper proceeds as follows. In Section I, I lay out a theoretical framework for understanding political parties and political ideologies. Section II reviews the politics of 1850, on the eve of the Civil War, in light of the theory in the first section. Section III develops a measure of ideology that is distinct from partisanship. Section IV presents that measure as calculated for the politics of the 1850s, to demonstrate that ideology then included the issue of slavery. Section V previews the application of this approach to other time periods in American history, and Section VI concludes. Section I: A THEORY OF IDEOLOGY AND PARTY. Understanding ideology requires that we disentangle it from political parties. This is not straightforward. Ideology and party are closely related, because political parties take up and advance ideologies, or they can. The first step, then, is to conceptually distinguish ideology from party. Chiefly, they are the domains of different actors, who have different purposes and dominate different spheres. Parties are dominated by politicians, while ideologies are shaped by activists, political thinkers and other opinion makers. Politicians want to get elected and control government, and that action takes place within the institutions of government. Ideologues want to figure out right and just policies, 3

Authors: Noel, Hans.
first   previous   Page 4 of 52   next   last



background image
This paper is part of a larger project on the relationship between party and ideology. Time and
again in American history, key issues or clusters of issues have changed their relationship to political
parties. In the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, Republicans were the party of big government,
whereas Democrats preferred local and state solutions to problems. But in the next century they changed
sides. The parties have also juggled positions on trade restrictions. Specie-based currency, temperance,
abortion policy and a host of other, major policies have aligned with the parties in different ways at
different times. Extensive study of Congressional voting and electoral campaigns gives us a rich picture
of party coalitions on these issues. But the positions taken by political intellectuals give us another,
equally rich view. I argue that the work of ideological thinkers tends to drive the party changes. I test the
argument by analyzing the issue preferences of intellectuals, beginning, in this paper, with the changes in
the 1850s.
This paper proceeds as follows. In Section I, I lay out a theoretical framework for understanding
political parties and political ideologies. Section II reviews the politics of 1850, on the eve of the Civil
War, in light of the theory in the first section. Section III develops a measure of ideology that is distinct
from partisanship. Section IV presents that measure as calculated for the politics of the 1850s, to
demonstrate that ideology then included the issue of slavery. Section V previews the application of this
approach to other time periods in American history, and Section VI concludes.
Section I: A THEORY OF IDEOLOGY AND PARTY.
Understanding ideology requires that we disentangle it from political parties. This is not
straightforward. Ideology and party are closely related, because political parties take up and advance
ideologies, or they can. The first step, then, is to conceptually distinguish ideology from party.
Chiefly, they are the domains of different actors, who have different purposes and dominate
different spheres. Parties are dominated by politicians, while ideologies are shaped by activists, political
thinkers and other opinion makers. Politicians want to get elected and control government, and that action
takes place within the institutions of government. Ideologues want to figure out right and just policies,
3


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 4 of 52   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.