All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Union, Nation, Empire: The Structure and Meaning of American History (previously "American Orders")
Unformatted Document Text:  The American invasion of Iraq in March 2003 and the development by the Bush administration of a new national security strategy provoked an enormous volume of commentary--a flood of books, essays, op-eds--on the theme of American empire. 1 The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, wrote one critic, “produced a dangerous change in the thinking of some of our leaders, who began to see our republic as a genuine empire, a new Rome, the greatest colossus in history, no longer bound by international law, the concerns of allies, or any constraints on its use of military force.” 2 The question urgently demanding attention, wrote another critic, “is not whether the United States has become an imperial power” but “what sort of empire [Americans] intend theirs to be.” 3 It was not only critics of the Iraq war who found “empire” to be the most apt label for what the United States had become. Neo-conservative supporters of the Bush administration did so as well. Columnist Max Boot, the author of a book of military history celebrating America’s participation in “small wars,” insisted that “Afghanistan and other troubled lands today cry out for the sort of enlightened foreign administration once provided by self-confident Englishmen in jodhpurs and pith helmets.” 4 Neo- conservatives such as Charles Krauthammer and Tom Donnelly (the latter of the Project for a New American Century) agreed that it was time to come out of the closet on the subject of American empire. Of the supporters of the Iraq war, however, perhaps the most brazen was British historian Niall Ferguson, who not only came out of the closet but nearly burned down the house. His argument, as he noted in Colossus: The Price of 1 This essay is based on the introductory chapters (1-3) of a book manuscript. The Table of Contents is appended at the end of the essay. 2 Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004, p. 3. 3 Andrew Bacevich, American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002, p. 244. 4 Max Boot, ‘The Case for American Empire’, The Weekly Standard, 2001, vol. 007, issue 005. 2

Authors: Hendrickson, David.
first   previous   Page 2 of 47   next   last



background image
The American invasion of Iraq in March 2003 and the development by the Bush
administration of a new national security strategy provoked an enormous volume of
commentary--a flood of books, essays, op-eds--on the theme of American empire.
The
terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, wrote one critic, “produced a dangerous change
in the thinking of some of our leaders, who began to see our republic as a genuine
empire, a new Rome, the greatest colossus in history, no longer bound by international
law, the concerns of allies, or any constraints on its use of military force.”
The question
urgently demanding attention, wrote another critic, “is not whether the United States has
become an imperial power” but “what sort of empire [Americans] intend theirs to be.”
It was not only critics of the Iraq war who found “empire” to be the most apt label
for what the United States had become. Neo-conservative supporters of the Bush
administration did so as well. Columnist Max Boot, the author of a book of military
history celebrating America’s participation in “small wars,” insisted that “Afghanistan
and other troubled lands today cry out for the sort of enlightened foreign administration
once provided by self-confident Englishmen in jodhpurs and pith helmets.”
Neo-
conservatives such as Charles Krauthammer and Tom Donnelly (the latter of the Project
for a New American Century) agreed that it was time to come out of the closet on the
subject of American empire. Of the supporters of the Iraq war, however, perhaps the most
brazen was British historian Niall Ferguson, who not only came out of the closet but
nearly burned down the house. His argument, as he noted in Colossus: The Price of
1
This essay is based on the introductory chapters (1-3) of a book manuscript. The Table of Contents is
appended at the end of the essay.
2
Chalmers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, New
York: Metropolitan Books, 2004, p. 3.
3
Andrew Bacevich, American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy,
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002, p. 244.
4
Max Boot, ‘The Case for American Empire’, The Weekly Standard, 2001, vol. 007, issue 005.
2


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 47   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.