All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

One European Directive, Two Dramatically Different Responses: Explaining the Divergence in French and German Racial Anti-Discrimination Policy After the Race Directive
Unformatted Document Text:  two countries may have other significantly different national institutions, in the area of anti-racism law, they actually had pretty similar policies. The common approach to anti- racism shared by these two countries is why they were originally chosen for this study. Fundamental law Both countries enshrine the idea that all people are equal, regardless of their race, in their fundamental law and make it illegal for the government to discriminate against people based on their race. In Germany, this is found in Article 3 of the German Basic Law (Constitution). This article outlaws discrimination by the state based on multiple grounds including race (Rasse), and homeland or origin (Heimat and Herkunft). 31 Some German legal scholars argue that Article 3.3 is applicable to private parties such as employers, but there has been no court that has enforced such an interpretation of the law. 32 Thus, as German law currently stands, the Basic Law provides legal protection from discrimination performed by the government only. In addition, many states also provide such legal protection in their state constitutions. 33 Similar guarantees of basic equality may be found in France’s Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen of 1789. 34 Laws Regulating Private Actors In addition to the protection of the fundamental law against discrimination by the government or public officials, both countries also have a large set of anti-racism laws regulating all citizens. These laws are usually found in the criminal code, and thus are 31 German Basic Law. http://www.datenschutz-berlin.de/recht/de/gg/gg1_de.htm#art3 (in German) last accessed May 2005. 32 See MacEwen, 151. 33 Mahlmann, Matthias, under the guidance of Migration Policy Group for the European Union Monitoring Center study on comparing national legislation in EU Member States with the Article 13 Directives, and includes information from an earlier report by Dan Leskien. Germany country report p.11, Berlin, Bavaria, Saxony, etc.. 34 See the submission of the “Notificaiton de la transposition en droit interne français de la directive 2000/43,” submitted to the European Commission 18 July 03.

Authors: Gehring, Jacqueline.
first   previous   Page 19 of 48   next   last



background image
two countries may have other significantly different national institutions, in the area of
anti-racism law, they actually had pretty similar policies. The common approach to anti-
racism shared by these two countries is why they were originally chosen for this study.
Fundamental law
Both countries enshrine the idea that all people are equal, regardless of their race,
in their fundamental law and make it illegal for the government to discriminate against
people based on their race. In Germany, this is found in Article 3 of the German Basic
Law (Constitution). This article outlaws discrimination by the state based on multiple
grounds including race (Rasse), and homeland or origin (Heimat and Herkunft).
Some
German legal scholars argue that Article 3.3 is applicable to private parties such as
employers, but there has been no court that has enforced such an interpretation of the
law.
Thus, as German law currently stands, the Basic Law provides legal protection
from discrimination performed by the government only. In addition, many states also
provide such legal protection in their state constitutions.
Similar guarantees of basic
equality may be found in France’s Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen of
1789.
Laws Regulating Private Actors
In addition to the protection of the fundamental law against discrimination by the
government or public officials, both countries also have a large set of anti-racism laws
regulating all citizens. These laws are usually found in the criminal code, and thus are
31
German Basic Law.
(in German) last
accessed May 2005.
32
See MacEwen, 151.
33
Mahlmann, Matthias, under the guidance of Migration Policy Group for the European Union Monitoring
Center study on comparing national legislation in EU Member States with the Article 13 Directives, and
includes information from an earlier report by Dan Leskien. Germany country report p.11, Berlin, Bavaria,
Saxony, etc..
34
See the submission of the “Notificaiton de la transposition en droit interne français de la directive
2000/43,” submitted to the European Commission 18 July 03.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 48   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.