All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

One European Directive, Two Dramatically Different Responses: Explaining the Divergence in French and German Racial Anti-Discrimination Policy After the Race Directive
Unformatted Document Text:  My paper approaches the incongruence between the EU race directive and pre- existing German and French institutions that influence racial policy (themselves quite different) and explores what explains the divergent responses of the two states, focusing on the influence of institutions, politics, and interest groups. In order to undertake this inquiry, I begin with an examination of the pre-existing legal, political, and social institutions which, I argue, have had an important influence over past racial policy making in the two countries and continue to exert influence on policy making related to race. My interest here in institutions, defined as formal or informal rule systems, should not be confused with a focus on organizations, which I define as groups of people organized to achieve a collective purpose, even though these two concepts are sometimes used interchangeably in the political science literature. 9 This examination of France and Germany’s pre-existing institutions will support my initial proposition that there was a lack of fit between the EU directive and the traditional institutions in these countries, although I will argue that changes in key French institutions, which were not obvious in 2000 have, in hindsight, improved the goodness of fit with the directive (there were also important shifts in Germany in the same period, but they were not enough to equal the goodness of fit that existed in France). I argue that it is these institutional changes in France which explain the strong implementation of the directive thus far. At this point, I turn to the policy making process surrounding the national transpositions of the race directive focusing on the roles played by institutions, politics, and interest groups in this process, hoping to tease out the effect of each of these variables on the transposition process. With the variables fully explained I then compare 9 For an example of how I hope to operationalize institutions and for a more thorough definition and explanation of the concepts see Stone Sweet, Alec, Sandholtz, Wayne, and Neil Fligstein, “Institutionalizing European Space” in The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford University Press, 2001.

Authors: Gehring, Jacqueline.
first   previous   Page 4 of 48   next   last



background image
My paper approaches the incongruence between the EU race directive and pre-
existing German and French institutions that influence racial policy (themselves quite
different) and explores what explains the divergent responses of the two states, focusing
on the influence of institutions, politics, and interest groups.
In order to undertake this inquiry, I begin with an examination of the pre-existing
legal, political, and social institutions which, I argue, have had an important influence
over past racial policy making in the two countries and continue to exert influence on
policy making related to race. My interest here in institutions, defined as formal or
informal rule systems, should not be confused with a focus on organizations, which I
define as groups of people organized to achieve a collective purpose, even though these
two concepts are sometimes used interchangeably in the political science literature.
This
examination of France and Germany’s pre-existing institutions will support my initial
proposition that there was a lack of fit between the EU directive and the traditional
institutions in these countries, although I will argue that changes in key French
institutions, which were not obvious in 2000 have, in hindsight, improved the goodness
of fit with the directive (there were also important shifts in Germany in the same period,
but they were not enough to equal the goodness of fit that existed in France). I argue that
it is these institutional changes in France which explain the strong implementation of the
directive thus far.
At this point, I turn to the policy making process surrounding the national
transpositions of the race directive focusing on the roles played by institutions, politics,
and interest groups in this process, hoping to tease out the effect of each of these
variables on the transposition process. With the variables fully explained I then compare
9
For an example of how I hope to operationalize institutions and for a more thorough definition and
explanation of the concepts see Stone Sweet, Alec, Sandholtz, Wayne, and Neil Fligstein,
“Institutionalizing European Space” in The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford University Press, 2001.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 4 of 48   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.