All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Partisanship in Transition: The Case of the Russian Federation 1995-2004
Unformatted Document Text:  15 Hanson, Stephen E. 2001. “Defining Democratic Consolidation,” in Richard D. Anderson, Jr., M. Steven Fish, Stephen E. Hanson, and Philip G. Roeder, Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy (Princeton: Princeton). Hanson, Stephen E. 2003. “Instrumental Democracy: The End of Ideology and the Decline of Russian Political Parties,” in Vicki L. Hesli and William M. Reisinger (eds.) The 1999-2000 Elections in Russia: Their Impact and Legacy (NY: Cambridge) pp.163-85. Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1984. “Political Loyalties and Social Class Ties: The Mechanisms of Contextual Influence,” American Journal of Political Science 28 (May) 399-417. Huckfeldt, Robert, Jeffrey Levine, William Morgan and John Sprague. 1999. “Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations,” American Journal of Political Science 43 (July): 888-911. Kitschelt, Herbert, and Regina Smyth. 2002. “Programmatic Party Cohesion in Emerging Postcommunist Democracies: Russia in Comparative Context,” Comparative Political Studies 35 (December): 1228-56. Lawson, Kay and Peter H. Merkl, eds. 1988. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations (Princeton: Princeton). Lipset, Seymour Martin. 2000. “The Indispensability of Political Parties,” Journal of Democracy, v.11, no.1, January, pp.48-55. MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson, and James A. Stimson. 1989. “Macropartisanship,” American Political Science Review 83 (December): 1125-42. Mair, Peter (ed.). 1990. The West European Party System (Oxford: Oxford). Meffert, Michael F. 2001. “Realignment and Macropartisanship,” American Political Science Review 95 (December): 953-62. Rose, Richard, and Neil Munro. 2002. Elections Without Order (NY: Cambridge University Press). Schattschneider, E.E. 1970. Party Government (Westport, CT: Greenwood, [1942]). Smyth, Regina. 2002. “Building State Capacity from the Inside Out,” Politics & Society, v.30, no.4, December, pp.555-78.

Authors: Hale, Henry. and Colton, Timothy.
first   previous   Page 15 of 15   next   last



background image
15
Hanson, Stephen E. 2001. “Defining Democratic Consolidation,” in Richard D. Anderson, Jr.,
M. Steven Fish, Stephen E. Hanson, and Philip G. Roeder, Postcommunism and the
Theory of Democracy
(Princeton: Princeton).
Hanson, Stephen E. 2003. “Instrumental Democracy: The End of Ideology and the Decline of
Russian Political Parties,” in Vicki L. Hesli and William M. Reisinger (eds.) The 1999-
2000 Elections in Russia: Their Impact and Legacy
(NY: Cambridge) pp.163-85.
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1984. “Political Loyalties and Social Class Ties: The Mechanisms of
Contextual Influence,” American Journal of Political Science 28 (May) 399-417.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Jeffrey Levine, William Morgan and John Sprague. 1999. “Accessibility and
the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations,” American Journal of
Political Science
43 (July): 888-911.
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Regina Smyth. 2002. “Programmatic Party Cohesion in Emerging
Postcommunist Democracies: Russia in Comparative Context,” Comparative Political
Studies
35 (December): 1228-56.
Lawson, Kay and Peter H. Merkl, eds. 1988. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative
Organizations (Princeton: Princeton).
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 2000. “The Indispensability of Political Parties,” Journal of
Democracy, v.11, no.1, January, pp.48-55.
MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson, and James A. Stimson. 1989. “Macropartisanship,”
American Political Science Review 83 (December): 1125-42.
Mair, Peter (ed.). 1990. The West European Party System (Oxford: Oxford).
Meffert, Michael F. 2001. “Realignment and Macropartisanship,” American Political Science
Review 95 (December): 953-62.
Rose, Richard, and Neil Munro. 2002. Elections Without Order (NY: Cambridge University
Press).
Schattschneider, E.E. 1970. Party Government (Westport, CT: Greenwood, [1942]).
Smyth, Regina. 2002. “Building State Capacity from the Inside Out,” Politics & Society, v.30,
no.4, December, pp.555-78.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 15 of 15   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.