|
|
|
|
Quaker Pennsylvania: Refuge from Priestcraft? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Historians agree that colonial Pennsylvania was a successful experiment in religious liberty. Some have claimed that this experiment provided an example separation of church and state that was the inspiration for the First Amendment. I argue that, although there was religious liberty, it was instituted as the first theological imperative that defined the Quaker theocracy in Pennsylvania. Quaker politicians, who were also the Quakers’ spiritual leaders, governed the province as their religious meeting writ large. Their regulatory laws and political tactics were designed to keep Pennsylvania under Quaker control and convince as many people as possible to at least act like, if not become, Quakers. This paper explores the tension inherent in the two seemingly contradictory aims of the Quaker theocracy in Pennsylvania—freedom and control. Was this truly a “peculiar ‘land of liberty,’” or was this “holy experiment” a new exercise in priestcraft? Or was it both at once? I find that the religious climate in Pennsylvania was as much a source of concern for the founders of the American Republic as a source of inspiration. Therefore, while the religious liberty may have influenced thinkers such as Jefferson, many others saw a great danger in the close connection between church and state and took steps to prevent such a thing in the federal government. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
quaker (255), pennsylvania (112), religi (99), polit (94), friend (80), govern (58), meet (54), coloni (50), ibid (50), philadelphia (45), assembl (45), new (42), see (41), one (40), law (40), would (38), liberti (37), power (37), smith (35), use (34), centuri (33), |
Author's Keywords:
|
First Amendment; separation of church and state; disestablishment; liberty of conscience; political culture; Society of Friends; eighteenth-century Pennsylvania |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Calvert, Jane. "Quaker Pennsylvania: Refuge from Priestcraft?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59069_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Calvert, J. , 2004-09-02 "Quaker Pennsylvania: Refuge from Priestcraft?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59069_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Historians agree that colonial Pennsylvania was a successful experiment in religious liberty. Some have claimed that this experiment provided an example separation of church and state that was the inspiration for the First Amendment. I argue that, although there was religious liberty, it was instituted as the first theological imperative that defined the Quaker theocracy in Pennsylvania. Quaker politicians, who were also the Quakers’ spiritual leaders, governed the province as their religious meeting writ large. Their regulatory laws and political tactics were designed to keep Pennsylvania under Quaker control and convince as many people as possible to at least act like, if not become, Quakers. This paper explores the tension inherent in the two seemingly contradictory aims of the Quaker theocracy in Pennsylvania—freedom and control. Was this truly a “peculiar ‘land of liberty,’” or was this “holy experiment” a new exercise in priestcraft? Or was it both at once? I find that the religious climate in Pennsylvania was as much a source of concern for the founders of the American Republic as a source of inspiration. Therefore, while the religious liberty may have influenced thinkers such as Jefferson, many others saw a great danger in the close connection between church and state and took steps to prevent such a thing in the federal government. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
36 |
| Word count: |
20406 |
| Text sample: |
| QUAKER PENNSYLVANIA: REFUGE FROM PRIESTCRAFT? Jane E. Calvert St. Mary's College of Maryland jecalvert@smcm.edu Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association September 2 - September 5 2004. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. Quaker Pennsylvania has been lauded as the greatest experiment in religious liberty in the early modern world and the strongest example of separation of church and state to influence the framers of the Constitution. In 1781 when Thomas |
| got his wish. While Pennsylvania was 219 Samuel Adams to Peter Thacher August 11 1778. Letters 10: 421. 220 Paine Common Sense 54. Calvert 36 undoubtedly a strong positive example of religious liberty it was an equally strong negative example of the necessity of separation of church and state. As clear as it is that Pennsylvania was a salutary experiment in religious liberty historians are wrong to credit Pennsylvania with separation of church and state. It did not |
Similar Titles:
Religious Power and Civil Society:
The Political Theology of Religious Liberty over Religious Toleration
The Origins of Religious Liberty in America: An Examination of Protestant Theology and Colonial Politics
|
|