 |
Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods
Craig Volden
*
Alan E. Wiseman
Department of Political Science
The Ohio State University
Abstract
We develop a sequential bargaining model in which a legislaturegoverned by majority rule divides a budget among its membersinto both particularistic and collective goods. We find, amongother things, that legislators tend to provide particularistic ratherthan collective goods when they do not heavily discount the future,when coalition formation is easy, and when the legislature is small.The amount spent on collective goods is a nonlinear function ofsuch factors as the relative value of collective goods investments,the size of the legislature, and the degree of legislative patience.And legislatures confronting both collective and particularisticspending options will vary in their preferences for open and closedamendment rules in understandable ways. In sum, our resultsprovide a unified picture of bargaining in legislatures over porkbarrel and general welfare legislation.
*
Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2-
September 5, 2004, Chicago, IL. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. We thank RomanIvanchenko for valuable research assistance. Please send questions and comments to: Alan E. Wiseman,Department of Political Science, 2140 Derby Hall, 154 North Oval Mall, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH,43210-1373, or email (wiseman.## email not listed ##).
|
| | Authors: Volden, Craig. and Wiseman, Alan. |
|
| |
|
|
Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods
Alan E. Wiseman
Department of Political Science
The Ohio State University
Abstract
We develop a sequential bargaining model in which a legislature governed by majority rule divides a budget among its members into both particularistic and collective goods. We find, among other things, that legislators tend to provide particularistic rather than collective goods when they do not heavily discount the future, when coalition formation is easy, and when the legislature is small. The amount spent on collective goods is a nonlinear function of such factors as the relative value of collective goods investments, the size of the legislature, and the degree of legislative patience. And legislatures confronting both collective and particularistic spending options will vary in their preferences for open and closed amendment rules in understandable ways. In sum, our results provide a unified picture of bargaining in legislatures over pork barrel and general welfare legislation.
*
Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2-
September 5, 2004, Chicago, IL. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. We thank Roman Ivanchenko for valuable research assistance. Please send questions and comments to: Alan E. Wiseman, Department of Political Science, 2140 Derby Hall, 154 North Oval Mall, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210-1373, or email (wiseman.## email not listed ##).
|
|
Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|