All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of Voter Choice and Turnout: Theoretical Results and Empirical Tests
Unformatted Document Text:  29 Appendix 4. Variable Coding for Empirical Analyses on Senate Elections Variables relating to Candidate Ideology (see equation 3) Variable NES Pooled Senate Election Study Variable ID Description/Coding Candidate ideology Respondent’s Liberal Con-servative Placement of candi-date (v.556 for Democratic candidates; v.557 for Repub-lican candidates) Candidate’s position computed as the mean location as-cribed to the candidate, averaged over all respondents who were willing to locate the candidate. State ideology Respondent’s Liberal-Conservative Self-Placement: v547 Mean position over all state respondents who were will-ing to self-place, averaged over all state respondents in-terviewed in the year of the senate election. Partisan divergence Respondent Lib-Cons Self-Placement: v547 Respondent Party Identifica-tion: v497 Difference between the State ideology (defined above) and the mean ideological self-placement of all respon-dents who self-identified with the candidate’s party. For these computations respondent were coded as Democratic Identifiers if V497 = 0,1,2 and as Republican identifiers if V497 = 4,5,6 Partisan size Respondent Party Identifica-tion: v497 Proportion of state respondents who self-identified with the candidate’s party Variables Relating to Democratic Candidate’s Vote Margin (see equation 4) Variable NES Pooled Senate Election Study Variable ID Description/Coding Democrat’s vote share Party of Candidate Voted for: v321 1 if respondent reports voting for the Democratic Candi-date, 0 if Republican Candidate. Votes for third party candidates and abstain coded as missing. Democrat’s proximity ad-vantage Resp. Liberal-Conservative Placement: v547 Resp. L-C Placement of Dem Candidate: v556 Resp. L-C Placement of Rep. Candidate: v557 Squared distance to Republican candidate minus squared distance to Democratic candidate (see equation 1). Esti-mates use the state/year average of v556 & v557, respec-tively, in this calculation.

Authors: Adams, James. and Merrill, Samuel, III.
first   previous   Page 29 of 41   next   last



background image
29
Appendix 4. Variable Coding for Empirical Analyses on Senate Elections
Variables relating to Candidate Ideology (see equation 3)
Variable
NES Pooled Senate
Election Study Variable ID

Description/Coding
Candidate
ideology
Respondent’s Liberal Con-
servative Placement of candi-
date (v.556 for Democratic
candidates; v.557 for Repub-
lican candidates)
Candidate’s position computed as the mean location as-
cribed to the candidate, averaged over all respondents
who were willing to locate the candidate.
State ideology
Respondent’s Liberal-
Conservative Self-Placement:
v547
Mean position over all state respondents who were will-
ing to self-place, averaged over all state respondents in-
terviewed in the year of the senate election.
Partisan
divergence
Respondent Lib-Cons Self-
Placement: v547
Respondent Party Identifica-
tion: v497
Difference between the State ideology (defined above)
and the mean ideological self-placement of all respon-
dents who self-identified with the candidate’s party. For
these computations respondent were coded as Democratic
Identifiers if V497 = 0,1,2 and as Republican identifiers if
V497 = 4,5,6
Partisan size
Respondent Party Identifica-
tion: v497
Proportion of state respondents who self-identified with
the candidate’s party
Variables Relating to Democratic Candidate’s Vote Margin (see equation 4)
Variable
NES Pooled Senate
Election Study Variable ID

Description/Coding
Democrat’s vote
share
Party of Candidate Voted for:
v321
1 if respondent reports voting for the Democratic Candi-
date, 0 if Republican Candidate. Votes for third party
candidates and abstain coded as missing.
Democrat’s
proximity ad-
vantage
Resp. Liberal-Conservative
Placement: v547
Resp. L-C Placement of Dem
Candidate: v556
Resp. L-C Placement of Rep.
Candidate: v557
Squared distance to Republican candidate minus squared
distance to Democratic candidate (see equation 1). Esti-
mates use the state/year average of v556 & v557, respec-
tively, in this calculation.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 41   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.