All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A Model of Adversarial Committees
Unformatted Document Text:  S. Berg, Condorcet’s Jury Theorem, Dependency among Jurors, Soc. Choice Welfare, 10 (1993) 87–95. P. Coughlan, In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts: Mistrials, Communication, and Strategic Voting, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 94 (2000) 375–393. Marquis de. Condorcet, Essai sur l’application de l’analyse a la probabiliti´ e des de- cisions rendues a la pluralite des voix . (Paris, 1785). A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York, Harper, 1957).J. Duggan and C. Martinelli, A Bayesian Model of Voting in Juries, Games Econ. Behav. 37 (2001) 259–294. T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, The Swing Voter’s Curse, Amer. Econ. Rev. 86 (1996) 408–424. T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information, Econometrica 65 (1997) 1029–1058. T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92 (1998)23–35. T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, Abstention in Elections with Asymmetric In- formation and Diverse Preferences, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 93 (1999) 381–398. D. Gerardi, Jury Verdicts and Preference Diversity, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94 (2000) 395–406. B. Grofman and S. Feld, Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 82 (1988) 567–576. K. Ladha, The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes, Amer. J. Polit. Sci., 36 (1992) 617–634. K. Ladha, Information Pooling Through Majority Rule Voting: Condorcet’s Jury The- orem with Correlated Votes, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 26 (1995) 353–372. A. McLennan, Consequences of the Condorcet Jury Theorem for Beneficial Information Aggregation by Rational Agents, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 92 (1998) 413–418. A. Meirowitz, Informative Voting and Condorcet Jury Theorems with a Continuum of Types, Soc. Choice Welfare, 19 (2002) 219–236. R. Myerson, Extended Poisson Games and the Condorcet Jury Theorem, Games Econ. Behav. 25 (1998) 111–131. R. Myerson, Large Poisson Games, J. Econ. Theory 94 (1999) 7–45.P. Young, Condorcet’s Theory of Voting, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 82 (1988) 1231–1244.J. Wit, Rational Choice and the Condorcet Jury Theorem, Games Econ. Behav., 22 (1998) 364–376. 30

Authors: Kim, Jaehoon.
first   previous   Page 30 of 30   next   last



background image
S. Berg, Condorcet’s Jury Theorem, Dependency among Jurors, Soc. Choice Welfare,
10 (1993) 87–95.
P. Coughlan, In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts: Mistrials, Communication, and
Strategic Voting, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 94 (2000) 375–393.
Marquis de. Condorcet, Essai sur l’application de l’analyse a la probabiliti´
e des de-
cisions rendues a la pluralite des voix . (Paris, 1785).
A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York, Harper, 1957).
J. Duggan and C. Martinelli, A Bayesian Model of Voting in Juries, Games Econ.
Behav. 37 (2001) 259–294.
T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, The Swing Voter’s Curse, Amer. Econ. Rev.
86 (1996) 408–424.
T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation
in Elections with Private Information, Econometrica 65 (1997) 1029–1058.
T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of
Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92 (1998)
23–35.
T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, Abstention in Elections with Asymmetric In-
formation and Diverse Preferences, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 93 (1999) 381–398.
D. Gerardi, Jury Verdicts and Preference Diversity, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94 (2000)
395–406.
B. Grofman and S. Feld, Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective,
Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 82 (1988) 567–576.
K. Ladha, The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes, Amer. J.
Polit. Sci., 36 (1992) 617–634.
K. Ladha, Information Pooling Through Majority Rule Voting: Condorcet’s Jury The-
orem with Correlated Votes, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 26 (1995) 353–372.
A. McLennan, Consequences of the Condorcet Jury Theorem for Beneficial Information
Aggregation by Rational Agents, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 92 (1998) 413–418.
A. Meirowitz, Informative Voting and Condorcet Jury Theorems with a Continuum of
Types, Soc. Choice Welfare, 19 (2002) 219–236.
R. Myerson, Extended Poisson Games and the Condorcet Jury Theorem, Games Econ.
Behav. 25 (1998) 111–131.
R. Myerson, Large Poisson Games, J. Econ. Theory 94 (1999) 7–45.
P. Young, Condorcet’s Theory of Voting, Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev., 82 (1988) 1231–1244.
J. Wit, Rational Choice and the Condorcet Jury Theorem, Games Econ. Behav., 22
(1998) 364–376.
30


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 30 of 30   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.