All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A Computational Model of Political Cognition: The Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation
Unformatted Document Text:  A Computational Model of Political Cognition - The Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation Kim, Sung-youn Stony Brook University Lodge, Milton Stony Brook University Taber, Charles Stony Brook University Abstract In this paper, we report on John Q. Public (JQP), a computational model of politicaljudgement which incorporates both cognitive and affective information within an ACT*-likesemantic network and integrates campaign events into candidate evaluations. We developa set of axioms for our underlying theory of information processing, represent those axiomsformally as a computer program written in Common Lisp within the ACT-R framework,and test the internal validity of the model through a series of computational experiments.Using the model, we also simulate the empirical dynamics of candidate evaluation overthe course of the 2000 presidential election campaign using NAES (National AnnenbergElection Survey) 2000 data. The results from computational experiments show that thesingle set of cognitive/affective mechanisms programmed into John Q. Public successfullyreproduce a set of well-known empirical phenomena found in electoral research and researchon political cognition. Specifically, in response to issue and candidate information, JQPreproduces 1) practice, recency, and spreading activation effects on recall, 2) cognitive andattitude priming effects, 3) question order and wording effects, 4) both on-line and memory-based processing, 5) and, most importantly, adjusts its beliefs and attitudes in response tocampaign events. The multiple agents based simulation of empirical dynamics of candidateevaluations in the 2000 eletion show that John Q. Public successfully and simulataneouslyreproduces the empirical dynamics across 5 different ideological groups. 1

Authors: Kim, Sung-youn., Lodge, Milton. and Taber, Charles.
first   previous   Page 1 of 40   next   last



background image
A Computational Model of Political Cognition
- The Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation
Kim, Sung-youn
Stony Brook University
Lodge, Milton
Stony Brook University
Taber, Charles
Stony Brook University
Abstract
In this paper, we report on John Q. Public (JQP), a computational model of political
judgement which incorporates both cognitive and affective information within an ACT*-like
semantic network and integrates campaign events into candidate evaluations. We develop
a set of axioms for our underlying theory of information processing, represent those axioms
formally as a computer program written in Common Lisp within the ACT-R framework,
and test the internal validity of the model through a series of computational experiments.
Using the model, we also simulate the empirical dynamics of candidate evaluation over
the course of the 2000 presidential election campaign using NAES (National Annenberg
Election Survey) 2000 data. The results from computational experiments show that the
single set of cognitive/affective mechanisms programmed into John Q. Public successfully
reproduce a set of well-known empirical phenomena found in electoral research and research
on political cognition. Specifically, in response to issue and candidate information, JQP
reproduces 1) practice, recency, and spreading activation effects on recall, 2) cognitive and
attitude priming effects, 3) question order and wording effects, 4) both on-line and memory-
based processing, 5) and, most importantly, adjusts its beliefs and attitudes in response to
campaign events. The multiple agents based simulation of empirical dynamics of candidate
evaluations in the 2000 eletion show that John Q. Public successfully and simulataneously
reproduces the empirical dynamics across 5 different ideological groups.
1


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 40   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.