All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Effective Market Power: the domestic institutional roots of international market regulation
Unformatted Document Text:  Richards’ analysis of the effects of market size on regulatory dynamics in the international civil aviation industry is particularly illustrative as he explicitly models a sequential bargaining process that is frequently alleged in the literature but rarely specified. International regulatory negotiations, he argues, take place in the shadow of the reversion point, that is, the set of market place rules that the market will revert back to if there is no new international agreement. States that have “market power to unilaterally define market place rules” are “able to dictate the reversion point…and are thereby able to define the choice set available to foreign governments.” 15 This alters the calculus for bargaining partners and might lead them to accept international rules that favor their competitors. 16 After World War II, the physical scope of the British Empire at a time when planes needed to land frequently and refuel gave British negotiators a decisive edge over their U.S. counterparts. Once technological change had reduced the value of overseas possessions, however, the U.S. could draw on its much larger share of the international commercial aviation market to shape market rules according to its preferences. In each instance, market size and the resulting ability to define the reversion point determined whose preferences would be reflected in international rules. Existing literature is clear in its causal focus on domestic market size as the critical determinant of international market power. Some authors stress the gravitational “pull” of major markets whereas others emphasize the centrality of large markets to “push” specific regulatory standards internationally. Some focus on the overall size of domestic economies whereas others adopt a sectoral lens and highlight international market share. But the shared expectation is that patterns of international regulatory influence closely reflect differences in market size across the principal protagonists. This leads to straightforward empirical expectations. International 15 Richards 1999, 13 . 16 See also Oatley and Nabors 1998 and Gruber 2000. 8

Authors: Bach, David. and Newman, Abraham.
first   previous   Page 9 of 49   next   last



background image
Richards’ analysis of the effects of market size on regulatory dynamics in the international
civil aviation industry is particularly illustrative as he explicitly models a sequential bargaining
process that is frequently alleged in the literature but rarely specified. International regulatory
negotiations, he argues, take place in the shadow of the reversion point, that is, the set of market
place rules that the market will revert back to if there is no new international agreement. States
that have “market power to unilaterally define market place rules” are “able to dictate the
reversion point…and are thereby able to define the choice set available to foreign
governments.”
This alters the calculus for bargaining partners and might lead them to accept
international rules that favor their competitors.
After World War II, the physical scope of the
British Empire at a time when planes needed to land frequently and refuel gave British
negotiators a decisive edge over their U.S. counterparts. Once technological change had reduced
the value of overseas possessions, however, the U.S. could draw on its much larger share of the
international commercial aviation market to shape market rules according to its preferences. In
each instance, market size and the resulting ability to define the reversion point determined
whose preferences would be reflected in international rules.
Existing literature is clear in its causal focus on domestic market size as the critical
determinant of international market power. Some authors stress the gravitational “pull” of major
markets whereas others emphasize the centrality of large markets to “push” specific regulatory
standards internationally. Some focus on the overall size of domestic economies whereas others
adopt a sectoral lens and highlight international market share. But the shared expectation is that
patterns of international regulatory influence closely reflect differences in market size across the
principal protagonists. This leads to straightforward empirical expectations. International
15
Richards 1999, 13 .
16
See also Oatley and Nabors 1998 and Gruber 2000.
8


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 49   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.