Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59413_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Dudziak, Mary. "Federalism and Foreign Affairs in 1960s Civil Rights Reform" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59413_index.html>

Dudziak, M. , 2004-09-02 "Federalism and Foreign Affairs in 1960s Civil Rights Reform" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59413_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Federalism and Foreign Affairs in 1960s Civil Rights Reform Mary L. Dudziak University of Southern California Law School This essay argues that a central issue in the history of federalism in the United States in the 20th century was the role of the U.S. in world politics, and the impact of international affairs on domestic constitutional development. The essay examines this issue through the example of the impact of international affairs on federalism in the civil rights context in the 1960s, focusing on arguments about foreign affairs in the debate over the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The historical record illustrates that one of the reasons President Kennedy supported a civil rights bill in 1963, and Congress passed it in 1964, was that race discrimination harmed the image of the U.S. in the world, which harmed U.S. foreign relations. In the context of the Cold War, perceived as a battle for the hearts and minds of the peoples of the world, the U.S. international image was thought to have great repercussions for U.S. national security. The paper does not argue that Congress explicitly drew upon foreign affairs powers in passing the Civil Rights Act. Instead it suggests that national security was part of the calculus when Congress weighed the importance of the national interests at stake in civil rights reform, and that assessment of the national interest must be kept in mind when examining the impact of civil rights reform on federalism. The impact of national security on federalism and the scope of federal power was not a new issue in the 1960s, for national security considerations underlay the virtual elimination of federalism as a limit on the Commerce Power during World War II. In these and other contexts, international affairs influenced the trajectory of federalism in 20th century American constitutional history. In this context and elsewhere, there is an international history to the story of “domestic” American law.

Rethinking Voice and Power: Civil Rights Organizations and Contemporary American Industrial Relations

Civil-Military Relations and Foreign Policy in the United States

Role-Playing in United States Foreign Relations: The National Security Council