All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

James Madison and the Natural History of the Democratic Party
Unformatted Document Text:  “The difficulty of uniting the minds of men accustomed to think and act differently can only be conceived by those who have witnessed it.” - James Madison to Edmund Pendleton, September 14, 1789 James Madison and the Natural History of the Democratic Party David Brian Robertson, University of Missouri - St. Louis To what problem did James Madison think the embryonic Democratic-Republican Party was a solution? As a delegate to the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Madison supported broad, strong national powers and disparaged political factions. Within five years, he seemed undergo a complete reversal. By 1792, he took strong stands against broad, strong national powers and personally was laying the foundations the Democratic-Republican Party. I argue that Madison’s reversal marked a tactical shift in pursuit of a consistent policy strategy, and that the Democratic-Republican Party was a natural result of that tactical shift. Madison was an outcome-driven policy strategist committed to republicanism, Virginia, and market-driven economic development. For Madison, comparative advantage fused these interests and principles into a coherent policy strategy: American national government should advance the nation’s comparative advantage in agricultural commodities. Madison’s broad policy strategy remained consistent through the 1780s and 1790s: he wanted to strengthen national powers to achieve the policy outcomes he preferred, and to weaken those national powers to pursue policies he opposed. He adjusted his political tactics, not his basic strategy, to changes in political structure and in the nature of the resistance he met. In the 1780s, the pursuit of these interests required a central government with strong revenue and commercial powers. When the Convention produced a government with less authority and less influence for Virginia than Madison intended, he used these same limitations tactically to build support for ratification. He and Alexander Hamilton could cooperate on the creation of a national government, but they soon found that they could not cooperate on that government’s use.

Authors: Robertson, David.
first   previous   Page 3 of 44   next   last



background image
“The difficulty of uniting the minds of men accustomed to think and act differently can only be conceived
by those who have witnessed it.”
- James Madison to Edmund Pendleton, September 14, 1789


James Madison and the Natural History of the Democratic Party
David Brian Robertson, University of Missouri - St. Louis
To what problem did James Madison think the embryonic Democratic-Republican Party
was a solution? As a delegate to the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Madison supported broad,
strong national powers and disparaged political factions. Within five years, he seemed undergo
a complete reversal. By 1792, he took strong stands against broad, strong national powers and
personally was laying the foundations the Democratic-Republican Party.
I argue that Madison’s reversal marked a tactical shift in pursuit of a consistent policy
strategy, and that the Democratic-Republican Party was a natural result of that tactical shift.
Madison was an outcome-driven policy strategist committed to republicanism, Virginia, and
market-driven economic development. For Madison, comparative advantage fused these
interests and principles into a coherent policy strategy: American national government should
advance the nation’s comparative advantage in agricultural commodities. Madison’s broad
policy strategy remained consistent through the 1780s and 1790s: he wanted to strengthen
national powers to achieve the policy outcomes he preferred, and to weaken those national
powers to pursue policies he opposed. He adjusted his political tactics, not his basic strategy,
to changes in political structure and in the nature of the resistance he met. In the 1780s, the
pursuit of these interests required a central government with strong revenue and commercial
powers. When the Convention produced a government with less authority and less influence for
Virginia than Madison intended, he used these same limitations tactically to build support for
ratification. He and Alexander Hamilton could cooperate on the creation of a national
government, but they soon found that they could not cooperate on that government’s use.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 44   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.