All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Educating Politics: The Transformation of Federal Education Policy 1965-2002
Unformatted Document Text:  3 and the ability of interest groups and narrow party constituencies to block public demands for policy reform. To understand how No Child Left Behind and the expanded federal role in education came to pass—and to understand the political dynamics that continue to shape federal education policy—this paper places the evolution of the federal role in schools within the context of broader institutional, ideational, and political changes in American politics between 1965 and 2002. Only by understanding the unique dynamics of federal education politics will reformers be able to craft a more effective national role in school reform. 1 Like earlier issues such as poverty, the environment, deregulation, and immigration, education emerged in the 1980s and 1990s from relative obscurity in national politics to assume a prominent place on the federal policymaking agenda. The emergence of each of these issues was due to the development of new policy images that fundamentally altered public and elite perceptions of the nature of the policy problem and the appropriate government response and in so doing changed their political and policymaking dynamics. Unlike these other issues, however, education was viewed by voters as one of the top issues in the country by the middle of the 1990s and it came to play a central role in wider debates about promoting opportunity and economic development. While issue evolution in the areas of poverty, the environment, regulation, and immigration resulted in some important changes in policy, the issue evolution in education reverberated throughout the political system and became one of the central questions of contemporary American electoral politics. 1 As Wirt and Kirst noted in their recent survey of the literature in this area, “The [current] gaps in education politics research will hinder our ability to devise policy solutions to many urgent education problems.” Frederick Wirt and Michael Kirst. The Political Dynamics of American Education (Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing, 1997) 342.

Authors: McGuinn, Patrick.
first   previous   Page 3 of 48   next   last



background image
3
and the ability of interest groups and narrow party constituencies to block public demands for
policy reform. To understand how No Child Left Behind and the expanded federal role in
education came to pass—and to understand the political dynamics that continue to shape
federal education policy—this paper places the evolution of the federal role in schools within
the context of broader institutional, ideational, and political changes in American politics
between 1965 and 2002. Only by understanding the unique dynamics of federal education
politics will reformers be able to craft a more effective national role in school reform.
1
Like earlier issues such as poverty, the environment, deregulation, and immigration,
education emerged in the 1980s and 1990s from relative obscurity in national politics to
assume a prominent place on the federal policymaking agenda. The emergence of each of
these issues was due to the development of new policy images that fundamentally altered
public and elite perceptions of the nature of the policy problem and the appropriate
government response and in so doing changed their political and policymaking dynamics.
Unlike these other issues, however, education was viewed by voters as one of the top issues in
the country by the middle of the 1990s and it came to play a central role in wider debates
about promoting opportunity and economic development. While issue evolution in the areas
of poverty, the environment, regulation, and immigration resulted in some important changes
in policy, the issue evolution in education reverberated throughout the political system and
became one of the central questions of contemporary American electoral politics.
1 As Wirt and Kirst noted in their recent survey of the literature in this area, “The [current] gaps in education
politics research will hinder our ability to devise policy solutions to many urgent education problems.”
Frederick Wirt and Michael Kirst. The Political Dynamics of American Education (Berkeley: McCutchan
Publishing, 1997) 342.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 48   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.