All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Dealing with a Self-Made Enemy: The Japanese State's Innovative Responses to Contentious Political Movements Over Time
Unformatted Document Text:  The Ministry of Transportation also employed non coercive tools, such as the ad hoc provision of slight discounts on electricity bills to local residents (Interviews, 25 August 2003). In the early 1980s, the central government developed an irrigation project to bring water into the Narita area for the remaining farmers and communities. In most cases, the central government covers up to three quarters the cost of such public works projects, but in this case, the central government assumed 95 percent of the expenses (Kitahara 1996: 135). The mid 1990s brought some calming of tensions through a series of symposia and workshops held between the government and anti-Narita groups. Narita is a symbol, interestingly enough, not only for government high handedness, but also siting success. Various anti-project citizen groups cited Narita as a praiseworthy accomplishment in which the people and the government worked out their differences. Citizens considering the Chubu Airport, for example, looked to the formation of the Narita symposium and round table for lessons in dealing with their own hosting issues (Chūnichi Shinbun 7 December 2002). Anti-dam activists called for similar Narita symposia-like meetings between the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport and anti-dam groups in which the government will acknowledge its mistakes and ill treatment of local citizens (Hagiwara 1996: 197-198). While the resistance at Narita triggered specific institutions like the Public Order Law and various subsidy systems to Sanrizuka and Narita area communities, the government did not expand these measures to other airport siting cases. Because resistance to airport siting is sporadic and inconsistent, the central government’s Ministry of Transportation developed only three tools for weakening citizen resistance. Central government planners point to the 1956 law Kūkō Seibihō, or the Airport Construction law, as a set of laws enacted by authorities to assist the siting of airports through the provisions of funds to host communities for a variety of areas, including soundproofing. In 1967 29

Authors: Aldrich, Daniel.
first   previous   Page 29 of 38   next   last



background image
The Ministry of Transportation also employed non coercive tools, such as the ad hoc
provision of slight discounts on electricity bills to local residents (Interviews, 25 August 2003).
In the early 1980s, the central government developed an irrigation project to bring water into the
Narita area for the remaining farmers and communities. In most cases, the central government
covers up to three quarters the cost of such public works projects, but in this case, the central
government assumed 95 percent of the expenses (Kitahara 1996: 135).
The mid 1990s brought some calming of tensions through a series of symposia and
workshops held between the government and anti-Narita groups. Narita is a symbol,
interestingly enough, not only for government high handedness, but also siting success. Various
anti-project citizen groups cited Narita as a praiseworthy accomplishment in which the people
and the government worked out their differences. Citizens considering the Chubu Airport, for
example, looked to the formation of the Narita symposium and round table for lessons in dealing
with their own hosting issues (Chūnichi Shinbun 7 December 2002). Anti-dam activists called
for similar Narita symposia-like meetings between the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and
Transport and anti-dam groups in which the government will acknowledge its mistakes and ill
treatment of local citizens (Hagiwara 1996: 197-198).
While the resistance at Narita triggered specific institutions like the Public Order Law and
various subsidy systems to Sanrizuka and Narita area communities, the government did not
expand these measures to other airport siting cases. Because resistance to airport siting is
sporadic and inconsistent, the central government’s Ministry of Transportation developed only
three tools for weakening citizen resistance.
Central government planners point to the 1956 law Kūkō Seibihō, or the Airport
Construction law, as a set of laws enacted by authorities to assist the siting of airports through the
provisions of funds to host communities for a variety of areas, including soundproofing. In 1967
29


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 38   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.