All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Delegating powers at the state level: Explaining the institutional designs of independent regulatory agencies in Brazil
Unformatted Document Text:  19 Finally, we also decided to include in the model the state per capita GDP as a controlling variable. This variable might be a good way of measuring the level of autonomy of the states vis a vis the national government. Thus, we expect that the greater the GDP per capita the less inclined and constrained the governor will be to follow the national executive’s preferences. We can also test for the effect of organizational isomorphism. It is expected that the diffusion of innovations would follow a pattern by which it would spread from the richest and most institutionally developed states to the more underdeveloped states. According to the first hypothesis, we predict negative coefficients for this variable. For the second hypothesis, we predict positive and significant coefficients. Table 3 - Logit Estimation on the Creation State Regulatory Agencies Models (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Constant -.182 (.605) -3.417 (2.113) -6.690 (3.961) -12.691 (6.902) -11.847 (7.082) -5.813 (4.299) Privatization 2.890 (1.197)** 5.349 (2.248)** 5.336 (2.513)** 6.403 (3.226)** 5.874 (3.197)* 5.269 (2.502)** Volatility 1.735 (.989)* 2.308 (1.379)* 2.426 (1.394)* 2.778 (1.758)* 2.570 (1.539)* Transferences .364 (.294) .332 (.307) .291 (.523) .374 (.371) Number of Effective Parties .594 (.450) .774 (.490) GDP -.710 (.868) -.378 (.601) % Prediction 77.77 88.88 88.88 88.88 92.59 88.88 Log likelihood -11.3197 -8.3731 -7.0832 -5.9978 -5.1374 -6.7661 Nº observations 27 27 27 27 27 27 Standard error in parenthesis Significance: 1% ***, 5% **, and 10% * The decision to set up state IRAs As we can see from the Table 3, the key results in all regressions are the positive and significant coefficients for Privatization and Volatility variables in all six models tested with different combinations of variables. These coefficients show that even when controlling for other variables that may affect the Governor’s decision of whether to construct an independent regulatory agency, an increase in the privatization and volatility also increases the probability that the governor will delegate powers to a regulatory agency. All different models presented a high percentage of prediction which suggests a good fit of the model. However, the model 5, the one that was included all variables, appears to be the highest one. Although the other variables were not statistically significant, they behaved

Authors: Pereira, Carlos. and Melo, Marcus.
first   previous   Page 19 of 32   next   last



background image
19
Finally, we also decided to include in the model the state per capita GDP as a
controlling variable. This variable might be a good way of measuring the level of autonomy
of the states vis a vis the national government. Thus, we expect that the greater the GDP per
capita the less inclined and constrained the governor will be to follow the national
executive’s preferences. We can also test for the effect of organizational isomorphism. It is
expected that the diffusion of innovations would follow a pattern by which it would spread
from the richest and most institutionally developed states to the more underdeveloped
states. According to the first hypothesis, we predict negative coefficients for this variable.
For the second hypothesis, we predict positive and significant coefficients.
Table 3 - Logit Estimation on the Creation State Regulatory Agencies
Models
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Constant
-.182
(.605)
-3.417
(2.113)
-6.690
(3.961)
-12.691
(6.902)
-11.847
(7.082)
-5.813
(4.299)
Privatization
2.890
(1.197)**
5.349
(2.248)**
5.336
(2.513)**
6.403
(3.226)**
5.874
(3.197)*
5.269
(2.502)**
Volatility
1.735
(.989)*
2.308
(1.379)*
2.426
(1.394)*
2.778
(1.758)*
2.570
(1.539)*
Transferences
.364
(.294)
.332
(.307)
.291
(.523)
.374
(.371)
Number of
Effective Parties
.594
(.450)
.774
(.490)
GDP
-.710
(.868)
-.378
(.601)
% Prediction
77.77
88.88
88.88
88.88
92.59
88.88
Log likelihood
-11.3197
-8.3731
-7.0832
-5.9978
-5.1374
-6.7661
Nº observations
27
27
27
27
27
27
Standard error in parenthesis
Significance: 1% ***, 5% **, and 10% *
The decision to set up state IRAs
As we can see from the Table 3, the key results in all regressions are the positive
and significant coefficients for Privatization and Volatility variables in all six models tested
with different combinations of variables. These coefficients show that even when
controlling for other variables that may affect the Governor’s decision of whether to
construct an independent regulatory agency, an increase in the privatization and volatility
also increases the probability that the governor will delegate powers to a regulatory agency.
All different models presented a high percentage of prediction which suggests a good fit of
the model. However, the model 5, the one that was included all variables, appears to be the
highest one. Although the other variables were not statistically significant, they behaved


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 32   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.