All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Law Enforcement and Civil Society in Russia
Unformatted Document Text:  1 The Putin administration sought to control civil society further in 2003. While it continued to encourage nongovernmental organizations that perform social support functions that the state cannot provide efficiently…it systematically worked to limit group activities that challenged state policy…. -- Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2004 1 Some human rights organizations want to show that everything is bad [with Russian law enforcement]. We try to find a constructive niche in law enforcement organs. -- Alexei Marchenko, Director of the Nizhniy Novgorod Project for Justice Assistance 2 Russian civil society seemingly is under threat from an increasingly authoritarian government. 3 Additional evidence for this view came in Vladimir Putin’s 2004 annual address to parliament, in which he criticized some unspecified civil society organizations for not “defending the real interests of people,” for prioritizing foreign funding, and for “serving doubtful group and commercial interests.” Additionally, recently proposed legislation would present further obstacles to grant-giving. 4 The role of state law enforcement agencies – police, secret police, prosecutors – in this process is generally conceived of as negative in two respects. First, Russian law enforcement bodies are seen as either instigators of these repressive tendencies, or as pliant tools of national and regional authoritarians. 5 Second, Russian law enforcement structures, even when not 1 Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2004: Russia, 2 [available at: http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/nattransit.htm]. 2 Author’s interview with Alexei Marchenko, Director of the Nizhniy Novgorod Project for Justice Assistance, Nizhniy Novgorod, 30 April 2003. 3 See, for example, Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2004; Sarah Mendelson, “Russian Rights’ Imperiled: Has Anybody Noticed?”, International Security, 26, 4 (Spring 2002), 39-69. 4 Vladimir Putin, “Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii,” 26 May 2004 [http://www.president.kremlin.ru/text/appears/2004/05/64870.shtml]; Anfisa Voronina, “Fil’tr dlya grantov,” Vedomosti, 23 July 2004; Oksana Yablokova, “New Controls Planned for Funding of NGOs,” Moscow Times, 22 July 2004. 5 See, for example: Arkady Ostrovsky, “Is Russian democracy becoming an illusion?”, Financial Times, 24 February 2004; Nikolai Petrov, “4 Years of Reforming the Federal System,” Moscow Times, 17 February 2004.

Authors: Taylor, Brian.
first   previous   Page 2 of 39   next   last



background image
1
The Putin administration sought to control civil society further in 2003. While it
continued to encourage nongovernmental organizations that perform social support
functions that the state cannot provide efficiently…it systematically worked to limit
group activities that challenged state policy….
-- Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2004
1
Some human rights organizations want to show that everything is bad [with Russian law
enforcement]. We try to find a constructive niche in law enforcement organs.
-- Alexei Marchenko, Director of the Nizhniy Novgorod
Project for Justice Assistance
2
Russian civil society seemingly is under threat from an increasingly authoritarian
government.
3
Additional evidence for this view came in Vladimir Putin’s 2004 annual
address to parliament, in which he criticized some unspecified civil society organizations
for not “defending the real interests of people,” for prioritizing foreign funding, and for
“serving doubtful group and commercial interests.” Additionally, recently proposed
legislation would present further obstacles to grant-giving.
4
The role of state law
enforcement agencies – police, secret police, prosecutors – in this process is generally
conceived of as negative in two respects. First, Russian law enforcement bodies are seen
as either instigators of these repressive tendencies, or as pliant tools of national and
regional authoritarians.
5
Second, Russian law enforcement structures, even when not
1
Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2004: Russia, 2 [available at:
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/nattransit.htm].
2
Author’s interview with Alexei Marchenko, Director of the Nizhniy Novgorod Project for Justice
Assistance, Nizhniy Novgorod, 30 April 2003.
3
See, for example, Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2004; Sarah Mendelson, “Russian Rights’
Imperiled: Has Anybody Noticed?”, International Security, 26, 4 (Spring 2002), 39-69.
4
Vladimir Putin, “Poslaniye Federal’nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii,” 26 May 2004
[http://www.president.kremlin.ru/text/appears/2004/05/64870.shtml]; Anfisa Voronina, “Fil’tr dlya
grantov,” Vedomosti, 23 July 2004; Oksana Yablokova, “New Controls Planned for Funding of NGOs,”
Moscow Times, 22 July 2004.
5
See, for example: Arkady Ostrovsky, “Is Russian democracy becoming an illusion?”, Financial
Times, 24 February 2004; Nikolai Petrov, “4 Years of Reforming the Federal System,” Moscow Times, 17
February 2004.


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 39   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.