All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Parties or Nations? Political Cleavages over EU Efforts to Create a Single European Market for Corporate Control
Unformatted Document Text:  Parties or Nations? Callaghan, H. and M. Höpner, APSA 2004 28 Table 2: Predicted Probabilities of delegates’ support for the directive La Porta index score of the delegate’s home country Party 0 1 2 3 4 5 GUE/NGL 0.0013 0.0046 0.0164 0.0568 0.1790 0.4410 Verts/ALE 0.0046 0.0163 0.0566 0.1783 0.4398 0.7397 PSE 0.0162 0.0563 0.1776 0.4387 0.7388 0.9110 PPE-DE 0.0561 0.1770 0.4376 0.7379 0.9106 0.9736 ELDR 0.1763 0.4364 0.7370 0.9102 0.9735 0.9925 UEN 0.4353 0.7361 0.9099 0.9733 0.9925 0.9979 Logit predicted probabilities of the delegate voting “yes” for all categories of the two explanatory variables, holding the three control variables constant at their mean. Software: STATA 8. Table 3: Number of delegates who voted yes/no on the takeover directive in the roll call vote of July 4, 2001, sorted by country and party group affiliation PPE-DE PSE ELDR Verts/ALE GUE/NGL UEN TDI EDD NI total yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no yes no Austria 0 6 0 7 0 1 4 0 18 Belgium 0 6 0 3 5 0 0 5 0 1 20 Denmark 1 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 13 Finland 3 1 3 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 13 France 15 4 16 4 0 9 0 9 3 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 71 Germany 1 51 0 34 0 5 0 5 96 Greece 1 8 2 7 0 6 24 Ireland 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 12 Italy 3 29 12 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 6 0 7 3 69 Luxembourg 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 6 Netherlands 0 9 1 6 7 0 0 4 0 1 0 3 31 Portugal 9 0 8 1 0 0 2 0 20 Spain 20 4 0 22 3 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 57 Sweden 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 18 UK 33 0 27 0 10 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 78 total 99 119 80 84 44 0 8 31 1 30 16 0 7 4 9 5 9 0 546 % * 44 54 49 51 100 0 20 76 3 79 100 0 44 25 53 29 90 0 96 *percentage voting yes [no] of all party group members who voted, including those who abstained Source: data set constructed by the authors on the basis of the EP roll call vote results reported in the Offical Journal of the European Communities (OJ, 2002)

Authors: Callaghan, Helen. and Höpner, Martin.
first   previous   Page 29 of 31   next   last



background image
Parties or Nations?
Callaghan, H. and M. Höpner, APSA 2004
28

Table 2: Predicted Probabilities of delegates’ support for the directive
La Porta index score of the delegate’s home country
Party
0
1
2
3
4
5
GUE/NGL
0.0013
0.0046
0.0164
0.0568
0.1790
0.4410
Verts/ALE
0.0046
0.0163
0.0566
0.1783
0.4398
0.7397
PSE
0.0162
0.0563
0.1776
0.4387
0.7388
0.9110
PPE-DE
0.0561
0.1770
0.4376
0.7379
0.9106
0.9736
ELDR
0.1763
0.4364
0.7370
0.9102
0.9735
0.9925
UEN
0.4353
0.7361
0.9099
0.9733
0.9925
0.9979
Logit predicted probabilities of the delegate voting “yes” for all categories of the two explanatory variables,
holding the three control variables constant at their mean. Software: STATA 8.









Table 3: Number of delegates who voted yes/no on the takeover directive in the roll call vote of July 4, 2001,
sorted by country and party group affiliation
PPE-DE
PSE
ELDR
Verts/ALE
GUE/NGL
UEN
TDI
EDD
NI
total
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
Austria
0
6
0
7
0
1
4
0
18
Belgium
0
6
0
3
5
0
0
5
0
1
20
Denmark
1
0
3
0
5
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
13
Finland
3
1
3
0
4
0
1
0
0
1
13
France
15
4
16
4
0
9
0
9
3
0
0
0
6
0
5
0
71
Germany
1
51
0
34
0
5
0
5
96
Greece
1
8
2
7
0
6
24
Ireland
4
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
4
0
12
Italy
3
29
12
0
4
0
0
0
1
4
6
0
7
3
69
Luxembourg
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
6
Netherlands
0
9
1
6
7
0
0
4
0
1
0
3
31
Portugal
9
0
8
1
0
0
2
0
20
Spain
20
4
0
22
3
0
3
1
0
4
0
0
57
Sweden
7
0
5
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
18
UK
33
0
27
0
10
0
2
4
0
2
0
0
78
total
99
119
80
84
44
0
8
31
1
30
16
0
7
4
9
5
9
0
546
% *
44
54
49
51
100
0
20
76
3
79
100
0
44
25
53
29
90
0
96
*percentage voting yes [no] of all party group members who voted, including those who abstained
Source: data set constructed by the authors on the basis of the EP roll call vote results reported in the
Offical Journal of the European Communities (OJ, 2002)


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 31   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.