All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"State Building for Future Wars: How Great Powers Balance Internally to Meet Long Term Threats
Unformatted Document Text:  of: (1) the ability of the state to raise or maintain levels of taxation before the mobilization drive; (2) the nature and immediacy of the international challenge and the expense of the leaders' preferred policies in comparison with past responses to similar challenges; and (3) the novelty and salient history of policy details within the preferred grand strategy. Christensen presents a "two-level" domestic mobilization model to explain anomaly for Waltz's balance-of-power theory: Sino-American enmity during the height of the cold war. The United States and the People's Republic of China not only failed to balance against the Soviet Union before the Nixon administration's opening to Beijing in 1972; they "were each other's most active enemy in the years 1949-1972, fighting wars in Korea and Vietnam that claimed the vast majority of each country's cold war casualties." 86 Christensen argues that in the late 1940s and 1950s, U.S. and Chinese leaders sought to mobilize domestic resources to balance against the long-term Soviet threat, but lacked sufficient national political power to do as they pleased. Therefore, the Truman administration and Mao Zedong used domestically popular, but overly aggressive, policies in areas of secondary concern as a diversion for necessary, expensive, and largely defensive policies in areas of primary concern. Leaders often encounter difficulties convincing the public to make significant sacrifices for national security, even if such efforts are in the public's own long-term interest. This is especially true in liberal democracies, where the average citizen "does not have the time or expertise to understand the subtleties of balance-of-power politics," tend to have a higher discount rate regarding geographically distant and indirect external threats than foreign policy elites, and have a further incentive to free ride on the sacrifices of others for national security objectives. 87 In authoritarian or totalitarian regimes "the only significant hurdle to immediate, all- out mobilization [is] the morale and spirit of sacrifice in the population at large." 88 Mobilization hurdles are likely to be particularly high where states currently face low levels of external vulnerability, but leaders nonetheless fear the emergence of new long-term threats. In order to mobilize and maintain broad support for strategies that they consider essential 29

Authors: Taliaferro, Jeffrey.
first   previous   Page 29 of 50   next   last



background image
of: (1) the ability of the state to raise or maintain levels of taxation before the mobilization drive;
(2) the nature and immediacy of the international challenge and the expense of the leaders'
preferred policies in comparison with past responses to similar challenges; and (3) the novelty
and salient history of policy details within the preferred grand strategy.
Christensen presents a "two-level" domestic mobilization model to explain anomaly for
Waltz's balance-of-power theory: Sino-American enmity during the height of the cold war. The
United States and the People's Republic of China not only failed to balance against the Soviet
Union before the Nixon administration's opening to Beijing in 1972; they "were each other's most
active enemy in the years 1949-1972, fighting wars in Korea and Vietnam that claimed the vast
majority of each country's cold war casualties."
1950s, U.S. and Chinese leaders sought to mobilize domestic resources to balance against the
long-term Soviet threat, but lacked sufficient national political power to do as they pleased.
Therefore, the Truman administration and Mao Zedong used domestically popular, but overly
aggressive, policies in areas of secondary concern as a diversion for necessary, expensive, and
largely defensive policies in areas of primary concern.
Leaders often encounter difficulties convincing the public to make significant sacrifices
for national security, even if such efforts are in the public's own long-term interest. This is
especially true in liberal democracies, where the average citizen "does not have the time or
expertise to understand the subtleties of balance-of-power politics," tend to have a higher
discount rate regarding geographically distant and indirect external threats than foreign policy
elites, and have a further incentive to free ride on the sacrifices of others for national security
In authoritarian or totalitarian regimes "the only significant hurdle to immediate, all-
Mobilization hurdles are likely to be particularly high where states currently face low
levels of external vulnerability, but leaders nonetheless fear the emergence of new long-term
threats. In order to mobilize and maintain broad support for strategies that they consider essential
29


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 50   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.