|
|
|
|
NATO Expansion: Were the Critics Wrong? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP!
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
I examine how well predictions about the effects of NATO expansion have fared since the first round in 1999. I argue that critics were mostly wrong, but that backers made many wrong predictions too. I examine the logic behind these positions and what lessons this has for future security policy debates. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
nato (246), would (131), russia (127), expans (126), state (74), 0 (72), secur (71), militari (70), critic (68), new (50), russian (48), 1999 (47), spend (47), central (46), europ (44), backer (43), arm (43), allianc (40), polici (37), entrant (36), argu (36), |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Ball, Christopher. "NATO Expansion: Were the Critics Wrong?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60083_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Ball, C. , 2004-09-02 "NATO Expansion: Were the Critics Wrong?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60083_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: I examine how well predictions about the effects of NATO expansion have fared since the first round in 1999. I argue that critics were mostly wrong, but that backers made many wrong predictions too. I examine the logic behind these positions and what lessons this has for future security policy debates. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
46 |
| Word count: |
12063 |
| Text sample: |
| NATO Expansion: Were the Critics Wrong? Christopher L. Ball Dept. of Political Science Iowa State University Panel: 19-9 Transatlantic Challenges Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association September 2 - September 5 2004. Most American academic security specialists opposed the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to include three former communist regimes in Central Europe when it was proposed and when the countries joined in 1999. In March 2004 NATO |
| Insufficient CE defense spending no Dilute alliance decision-making no no Excessive CE defense spending unknown Create new division in Europe Backer predictions Deter future Russian aggression unknown Aid CE democratic consolidation no/disputed no Reassure Russia partial Reduce security dilemma in CE 45 |
Similar Titles:
Russia’s Friend – United State’s Enemy: Russian Foreign Policy toward Iran
State security and Russian telecommunications policy: Evolution of concepts and meanings, 1991-2003
Debating "Soft Power" in Japan's Security Policy: Implications for Alliance with the United States
The Russian Security Policy in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Betwen confrontation to cooperation.
The Revolution in Military Affairs and Security of Small States: Israel's RMA Trajectory and Force Modernization Programs (1995-2008)
|
|
