Author's Keywords: hegemony, international trade	Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60193_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Sacko, David. and Jungblut, Bernadette. "Hegemony`s Effect on Interstate Trade: Leveling the Playing Field - or the Rich Get Richer While the Poor Get Poorer?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60193_index.html>

Sacko, D. H. and Jungblut, B. M. , 2004-09-02 "Hegemony`s Effect on Interstate Trade: Leveling the Playing Field - or the Rich Get Richer While the Poor Get Poorer?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60193_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper examines the impact of hegemonic governance on interstate trade. Whether and how hegemonic leadership affects the international political economy have lately received scant attention in the political science and economics literatures. This is unfortunate, given the potential explanatory power of this rich theoretical perspective. This paper has three (3) components. First, we review the theoretical arguments and earlier empirical investigations linking hegemonic leadership to international economic stability. Although the majority of previous studies tend to find some support for the hypothesis that hegemony is not a necessary condition for financial stability and hence, increased international trade, these examinations leave many important questions unanswered or at best, with ambiguous answers. To address these questions, we develop a more complete theoretical argument explaining how hegemony affects interstate trade – at the systemic, major power sub-systemic, and dyadic levels of analysis. We hypothesize that strong hegemony increases trade across the system, among major powers, and also within nation-state pairs where the hegemon—the state with the ability, the will, and the acceptance of other states to assume leadership—has strategic interests. Finally, we use comprehensive, multidimensional indicators (from Sacko 2003) to conduct a much improved assessment of the effects of both the “hegemonic power” and “hegemonic interest” of the United Kingdom (1816-1945) and the United States (1946-1992) on interstate trade. We find that hegemonic governance does not statistically significantly affect aggregate world trade. Hegemonic governance, however, is statistically significantly and positively related to both major power sub-systemic trade – and to trade within dyads strategically relevant to the hegemon.

Why do states choose certain normative strategies over others in world politics? Interrogating theories of normative state agency in International Relations.

The 'Debate about Empire' and International Relations Theory: Beyond the Narratives of Sovereign and Imperial Power in Theorizing Modern World Politics

The 'Debate About Empire' and International Relations Theory; Beyond the Narratives of Sovereign and Imperial Power in Theorizing Modern World Politics