All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

National Tides and Local Results in U.S. House Elections
Unformatted Document Text:  Table A2. Full Results for Table 2—Explaining the change in the challenger’s vote share McGhee 38 Vote Swing (Year) -6.27 (1994) -3.38 (1984) -3.03 (1980) -2.43 (1978) -1.68 (1976) -1.43 (1992) -1.06 (1988) -.62 (1998) Constant 30.97*** 24.16*** 19.99*** 17.65*** 15.70*** 27.41*** 19.01*** 18.05*** Previous vote for challenger's party -0.66*** -0.54*** -0.47*** -0.45*** -0.44*** -0.63*** -0.50*** -0.52*** (0.03) (0.04) (0.04) (0.04) (0.04) (0.05) (0.05) (0.03) Uncontested -29.96*** -30.28*** -27.87*** -28.93*** -27.35*** -31.10*** -31.77*** -32.04*** (0.85) (1.02) (0.97) (0.92) (1.07) (1.45) (1.02) (0.60) Uncontested in previous election 19.89*** 16.68*** 19.62*** 22.14*** 20.84*** 24.55*** 21.16*** 23.20*** (1.16) (1.22) (1.01) (1.20) (1.18) (1.27) (1.17) (1.24) Open in previous election 1.10# -2.19* -3.40*** -2.18* -2.10* -2.16 -1.21 -1.43# (0.62) (0.96) (0.92) (0.96) (0.94) (1.39) (1.27) (0.73) Change in challenger experience 0.85 1.63* 1.60* 2.39** 1.45* 1.69# 0.43 1.24* (0.65) (0.71) (0.70) (0.69) (0.64) (0.96) (0.98) (0.53) Change in challenger spending 0.26*** 0.27*** 0.26*** 0.25*** 0.22*** 0.26*** 0.20*** 0.27*** (0.02) (0.03) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.04) (0.03) (0.03) Democratic challenger -9.25*** -5.85*** -2.20** -1.71* -0.18 -1.18 -1.31 0.72 (0.58) (0.76) (0.66) (0.73) (0.75) (0.79) (0.82) (0.52) Democratic challenger x spending 0.01 0.01 0.06 -0.03 -0.00 -0.04 0.04 -0.08* (0.04) (0.05) (0.04) (0.04) (0.04) (0.06) (0.05) (0.03) District partisanship -0.38*** -0.21*** -0.20*** -0.18** -0.12* -0.35*** -0.14* -0.16*** (0.04) (0.05) (0.06) (0.06) (0.05) (0.05) (0.06) (0.04) Adj R 2 0.89 0.77 0.82 0.83 0.78 0.85 0.78 0.90 M.S.E. 4.81 6.61 5.82 6.11 5.96 6.78 7.21 4.60 N 375 407 387 374 379 338 401 393 Cell entries are unstandardized OLS regression coefficients. Dependent variable in each model is the change in the district two-party vote for the challenger from the previous election. Models were estimated in Stata 8.0 (StataCorp 2003). Standard errors are in parentheses. # p<.10, *p<.05, **p<.01

Authors: McGhee, Eric.
first   previous   Page 39 of 43   next   last



background image
Table A2. Full Results for Table 2—Explaining the change in the challenger’s vote share
McGhee 38
Vote Swing (Year)
-6.27 (1994)
-3.38 (1984)
-3.03 (1980)
-2.43 (1978)
-1.68 (1976)
-1.43 (1992)
-1.06 (1988)
-.62
(1998)
Constant
30.97***
24.16***
19.99***
17.65***
15.70***
27.41***
19.01***
18.05***
Previous vote for challenger's party
-0.66***
-0.54***
-0.47***
-0.45***
-0.44***
-0.63***
-0.50***
-0.52***
(0.03)
(0.04)
(0.04)
(0.04)
(0.04)
(0.05)
(0.05)
(0.03)
Uncontested
-29.96***
-30.28***
-27.87***
-28.93***
-27.35***
-31.10***
-31.77***
-32.04***
(0.85)
(1.02)
(0.97)
(0.92)
(1.07)
(1.45)
(1.02)
(0.60)
Uncontested in previous election
19.89***
16.68***
19.62***
22.14***
20.84***
24.55***
21.16***
23.20***
(1.16)
(1.22)
(1.01)
(1.20)
(1.18)
(1.27)
(1.17)
(1.24)
Open in previous election
1.10#
-2.19*
-3.40***
-2.18*
-2.10*
-2.16
-1.21
-1.43#
(0.62)
(0.96)
(0.92)
(0.96)
(0.94)
(1.39)
(1.27)
(0.73)
Change in challenger experience
0.85
1.63*
1.60*
2.39**
1.45*
1.69#
0.43
1.24*
(0.65)
(0.71)
(0.70)
(0.69)
(0.64)
(0.96)
(0.98)
(0.53)
Change in challenger spending
0.26***
0.27***
0.26***
0.25***
0.22***
0.26***
0.20***
0.27***
(0.02)
(0.03)
(0.02)
(0.02)
(0.02)
(0.04)
(0.03)
(0.03)
Democratic challenger
-9.25***
-5.85***
-2.20**
-1.71*
-0.18
-1.18
-1.31
0.72
(0.58)
(0.76)
(0.66)
(0.73)
(0.75)
(0.79)
(0.82)
(0.52)
Democratic challenger x spending
0.01
0.01
0.06
-0.03
-0.00
-0.04
0.04
-0.08*
(0.04)
(0.05)
(0.04)
(0.04)
(0.04)
(0.06)
(0.05)
(0.03)
District partisanship
-0.38***
-0.21***
-0.20***
-0.18**
-0.12*
-0.35***
-0.14*
-0.16***
(0.04)
(0.05)
(0.06)
(0.06)
(0.05)
(0.05)
(0.06)
(0.04)
Adj R
2
0.89
0.77
0.82
0.83
0.78
0.85
0.78
0.90
M.S.E.
4.81
6.61
5.82
6.11
5.96
6.78
7.21
4.60
N
375
407
387
374
379
338
401
393
Cell entries are unstandardized OLS regression coefficients. Dependent variable in each model is the change in the district two-party vote for the challenger from the previous
election. Models were estimated in Stata 8.0 (StataCorp 2003). Standard errors are in parentheses.
#
p<.10, *p<.05, **p<.01


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 39 of 43   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.