All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Re-Redistricting in Texas and Colorado: Questions of Process and Impact
Unformatted Document Text:  27 64 Again, the two dissenting justices took exception to the majority's interpretation of these provisions of the state constitution. 65 Recall that a federal court challenge to the Colorado General Assembly's 2003 redistricting plan was stayed in the wake of the state Supreme Court's decision in Salazar v. Davidson on the grounds that the federal constitutional questions had been decided. 66 Both courts ruling on the legal of second redistricting plans recognized this as a central issue. The U.S. District Court in Texas characterized the plaintiffs' claim against mid-decade redistricting "[p]erhaps the most compelling argument" (Session v. Perry) while the Colorado Supreme Court term this "[t]he critical question" (Salazar v. Davidson, 1237. 67 Session v. Perry. 68 Salazar v. Davidson, 1235 (emphasis added). 69 David Butler and Bruce Cain, Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives (New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1992), p. 2. 70 Butler and Cain, Congressional Redistricting, p. 1.

Authors: King, James., Engstrom, Richard. and Riddlesperger, James.
first   previous   Page 28 of 28   next   last



background image
27
64
Again, the two dissenting justices took exception to the majority's interpretation of
these provisions of the state constitution.
65
Recall that a federal court challenge to the Colorado General Assembly's 2003
redistricting plan was stayed in the wake of the state Supreme Court's decision in Salazar v.
Davidson on the grounds that the federal constitutional questions had been decided.
66
Both courts ruling on the legal of second redistricting plans recognized this as a central
issue. The U.S. District Court in Texas characterized the plaintiffs' claim against mid-decade
redistricting "[p]erhaps the most compelling argument" (Session v. Perry) while the Colorado
Supreme Court term this "[t]he critical question" (Salazar v. Davidson, 1237.
67
Session v. Perry.
68
Salazar v. Davidson, 1235 (emphasis added).
69
David Butler and Bruce Cain, Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and
Theoretical Perspectives (New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1992), p. 2.
70
Butler and Cain, Congressional Redistricting, p. 1.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 28 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.