|
|
|
|
"Worked Out in Fractions": Neutral Competence, FDR and the Bureau of the Budget |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Presidents seem to scorn the “neutral competence” political scientists insist they need. Franklin Roosevelt (1933-45), however, evidently embraced this administrative approach – even at a time when the demands for presidential leadership were arguably greater than that experienced by any of his successors. Roosevelt thus offers an important historical test case for both critics and advocates of neutral competence. Focusing specifically on the Bureau of the Budget (BoB), we ask what historical circumstances dictated FDR’s use of this agency; how, if at all, that use comported with the more abstract notions of a neutrally competent presidential staff; and what lessons, if any, result for modern presidents. We argue that the BoB under FDR epitomized neutral competence, but that this orientation responded to his political needs. More generally, we conclude that what constitutes responsiveness varies greatly depending on a president’s political context. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
presid (142), smith (120), budget (114), fdr (89), bureau (86), bob (79), roosevelt (73), administr (70), polit (59), execut (53), see (51), govern (51), staff (49), agenc (44), offic (41), would (41), one (36), dougla (36), depart (34), new (34), compet (33), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Bureau of the Budget, BoB, FDR, neutral competence, responsive competence, institutional presidency, presidential staff, EOP |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Dickinson, Matthew. and Rudalevige, Andrew. ""Worked Out in Fractions": Neutral Competence, FDR and the Bureau of the Budget" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60337_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Dickinson, M. J. and Rudalevige, A. , 2004-09-02 ""Worked Out in Fractions": Neutral Competence, FDR and the Bureau of the Budget" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60337_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Presidents seem to scorn the “neutral competence” political scientists insist they need. Franklin Roosevelt (1933-45), however, evidently embraced this administrative approach – even at a time when the demands for presidential leadership were arguably greater than that experienced by any of his successors. Roosevelt thus offers an important historical test case for both critics and advocates of neutral competence. Focusing specifically on the Bureau of the Budget (BoB), we ask what historical circumstances dictated FDR’s use of this agency; how, if at all, that use comported with the more abstract notions of a neutrally competent presidential staff; and what lessons, if any, result for modern presidents. We argue that the BoB under FDR epitomized neutral competence, but that this orientation responded to his political needs. More generally, we conclude that what constitutes responsiveness varies greatly depending on a president’s political context. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
41 |
| Word count: |
13611 |
| Text sample: |
| "Worked Out in Fractions": Neutral Competence FDR and the Bureau of the Budget Matthew J. Dickinson Department of Political Science Middlebury College dickinso@middlebury.edu Andrew Rudalevige Department of Political Science Dickinson College Center for the Study of Democratic Politics Princeton University arudalev@princeton.edu Paper prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago IL September 2-5 2004. Thanks to the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute and Dickinson College for financial support of this project; to |
| Reagan's use of similar structures in the 1980s. Smith had an inkling of the enormity of the task back in 1939. He confided then that "the details of the working together of the management arms of the President will have to be worked out in fractions a kind of 73 Dickinson and Rudalevige "Presidents Responsiveness and Competence." On political time see Stephen Skowronek The Politics Presidents Make (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1994). 41 adjustment of the harness as the |
Similar Titles:
Executive Dominance, Shared Competence, or Just the President’s Interests: What Should We Expect from the President’s Budget?
Explaining Agency Budget Choices: Are Disciplined Decisions (Actual Requests) Affected More by Administrator’s Aspirations (Decision Premises) or by Political Principals’ Priorities (Executive-Legislative Preferences)?
|
|