|
|
|
|
Vertical Integration in Municipal Service Provision: |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Tremendous attention has been given to the use of alternative service delivery mechanisms by which local governments contract with private for-profit or nonprofit firms to deliver services. What has gone virtually unnoticed is that many of these arrangements experienced “vertical integration of production” where the service is taken in-house by the providing government.
Building on three typologies of service characteristics that are prominent in the literature, we examine whether vertical integration is systemically associated with certain types of goods and test whether the likelihood of vertical integration increases when mismatches occur between the service types and the modes of service delivery. Vertical integration can also be a response to market conditions, capacities for production and administration within government, or political, preferences of public decision makers. We view the vertical integration of services as more than the reverse of contracting out; it is the product of three distinct transaction problems relating to the characteristics of goods, production agents, and markets.
Empirical analysis of patterns of service production from 1997-2002 reveals that vertical integration of production is relatively more likely than additional contracting with private providers and almost as many services were brought in-house as contracted out in that period. The multivariate analysis reports finds services offered though joint production arrangements are most likely to be taken in house. The types of goods provide an incomplete explanation for local service delivery decisions; a more complete model highlights the role of jurisdiction level factors. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
servic (255), contract (112), hous (100), profit (99), integr (86), product (82), vertic (81), privat (62), in-hous (60), non (60), for-profit (60), public (57), govern (56), meter (47), good (46), market (41), 1997 (40), chang (40), non-profit (35), deliveri (34), local (34), |
Author's Keywords:
|
contracting, service delivery, local government, governance, outsourcing, privitization, vertical integreation |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Feiock, Richard., Lamothe, Scott. and Lamothe, Meeyoung. "Vertical Integration in Municipal Service Provision:" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60373_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Feiock, R. C., Lamothe, S. and Lamothe, M. , 2004-09-02 "Vertical Integration in Municipal Service Provision:" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60373_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Tremendous attention has been given to the use of alternative service delivery mechanisms by which local governments contract with private for-profit or nonprofit firms to deliver services. What has gone virtually unnoticed is that many of these arrangements experienced “vertical integration of production” where the service is taken in-house by the providing government.
Building on three typologies of service characteristics that are prominent in the literature, we examine whether vertical integration is systemically associated with certain types of goods and test whether the likelihood of vertical integration increases when mismatches occur between the service types and the modes of service delivery. Vertical integration can also be a response to market conditions, capacities for production and administration within government, or political, preferences of public decision makers. We view the vertical integration of services as more than the reverse of contracting out; it is the product of three distinct transaction problems relating to the characteristics of goods, production agents, and markets.
Empirical analysis of patterns of service production from 1997-2002 reveals that vertical integration of production is relatively more likely than additional contracting with private providers and almost as many services were brought in-house as contracted out in that period. The multivariate analysis reports finds services offered though joint production arrangements are most likely to be taken in house. The types of goods provide an incomplete explanation for local service delivery decisions; a more complete model highlights the role of jurisdiction level factors. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
33 |
| Word count: |
8044 |
| Text sample: |
| Vertical Integration in Municipal Service Provision: In-House Public Production of Previously Outsourced Services Richard C. Feiock Askew School of Public Administration Florida State University Tallahassee FL 32303 rfeiock@coss.fsu.edu 850-644-3525 & Scott Lamothe Department of Political Science University of Nebraska-Lincoln slamothe2@unl.edu 402-472-5642 & Meeyoung Lamothe Department of Public Administration University of Nebraska at Omaha Tremendous attention has been given to contracting or outsourcing service productions. What has gone virtually unnoticed is that many of these services have experienced "vertical integration |
| pool for potential non-profit services that become vertically integrated by local governments (coded as using non-profit service delivery in 1997) in this service category was only 12. Hence the non-meterable monopoly service change ratio of 50 percent associated with non-profits represents a total of 6 cases of the service being internalized. The related for-profit vertical integration rate was produced by 34 from a potential pool of 52. 6 "Influence" is defined as the change in predicted probability when holding |
Similar Titles:
The Roots of Public-Private Collaboration: Understanding Local Government-Nonprofit Service Delivery Partnerships in Georgia
Public and Private Joint Production: Institutional Theory of Local Governance and Government Capacity
|
|