Author's Keywords: Health policy, interest groups, rent seeking, provider payment	Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60428_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Weissert, William. and Weissert, Carol. "THE CONGRESS, INTEREST GROUPS, AND PUBLIC POLICY:" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60428_index.html>

Weissert, W. and Weissert, C. S. , 2004-09-02 "THE CONGRESS, INTEREST GROUPS, AND PUBLIC POLICY:" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60428_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In this paper we begin the inquiry into an congressional-interest group relationship and its impact on public policy looking at one example in health policy. We argue that Congress is in the driver’s seat in the relationship with interest groups and that it is in Members’ best interest to take small, incremental policy steps, often seemingly against interest group preferences, with the idea that such actions will garner additional “rent” from the groups in future years. Members simply don’t benefit adequately from “solving” a problem; they benefit most from partially solving the problem (enough to take credit for solving it) but then quietly returning to the table at a later time when more interest group rent can be extracted. In this paper we analyze Medicare provider payments between 1997 and 2003—a time when the Congress first “took away” resources from interests and then slowly gave them back as an example of how Congress can successfully extract rent and, with the help of groups, justify why their action is good public policy.

The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interest Groups: Patterns of Interest Group Contributions

American Interest Group Politics in the 21st Century: Public and Private Interests and the Deadlock of American Public Policy