All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Candidate Gender and Voting in Statewide Elections: Evidence from Ohio
Unformatted Document Text:  18 Table 2. Determinants of the Baseline Gender Preference Prefer Man Prefer Woman Trait Stereotype Women less emotionally suited for politics (disagree) -.71** (.12) .41** (.12) Issue Position Stereotypes Abortion .05 (.15) .04 (.14) Government spending .17 (.17) .32* (.16) Issue Competency Stereotype Foreign affairs -.42* (.19) .11 (.14) Demographics Female -.54* (.25) 1.13** (.23) Age .001 (.01) -.01 a (.007) Education -.10 (.12) .06 (.10) Religiosity -.06 (.10) -.04 (.09) Black .26 (.51) -.90* (.40) Party Party identification -.08 (.06) .15** (.05) Issue Positions Government spending .06 (.17) .23 (.16) Abortion -.26 (.21) .35 a (.19) Change politics as usual -.33* (.14) .23 a (.13) Intercept 3.23** (.90) -4.46** (.91) n = 557; Initial log likelihood = -601.27 Final log likelihood = -478.71 χ 2 = 245.13** (26 df) a p<.10, * p<.05, ** p<.01 ; Cell entries are maximum likelihood estimates with standard errors in parentheses.

Authors: Sanbonmatsu, Kira.
first   previous   Page 19 of 23   next   last



background image
18
Table 2. Determinants of the Baseline Gender Preference
Prefer Man
Prefer Woman
Trait Stereotype
Women less emotionally suited
for politics (disagree)
-.71**
(.12)
.41**
(.12)
Issue Position Stereotypes
Abortion
.05
(.15)
.04
(.14)
Government spending
.17
(.17)
.32*
(.16)
Issue Competency Stereotype
Foreign affairs
-.42*
(.19)
.11
(.14)
Demographics
Female
-.54*
(.25)
1.13**
(.23)
Age
.001
(.01)
-.01
a
(.007)
Education
-.10
(.12)
.06
(.10)
Religiosity
-.06
(.10)
-.04
(.09)
Black
.26
(.51)
-.90*
(.40)
Party
Party identification
-.08
(.06)
.15**
(.05)
Issue Positions
Government spending
.06
(.17)
.23
(.16)
Abortion
-.26
(.21)
.35
a
(.19)
Change politics as usual
-.33*
(.14)
.23
a
(.13)
Intercept 3.23**
(.90)
-4.46**
(.91)
n = 557; Initial log likelihood = -601.27
Final log likelihood = -478.71
χ
2
= 245.13** (26 df)
a
p<.10, * p<.05, ** p<.01 ; Cell entries are maximum likelihood estimates with standard errors in parentheses.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 23   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.