All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Candidate Gender and Voting in Statewide Elections: Evidence from Ohio
Unformatted Document Text:  Candidate Gender and Voting in Statewide Elections: Evidence from Ohio What is the significance of candidate gender for American elections? Because most aggregate studies have found that women and men win their races at similar rates on average, many scholars have assumed that voters’ gender stereotypes are inconsequential. However, these assumptions have not usually been tested empirically. The dearth of public opinion surveys that include both individual-level stereotype measures and vote choice questions have made studying these questions more difficult. As a result, some studies have examined the effects of stereotypes on hypothetical vote questions. Other scholars have modeled voting behavior but without the benefit of gender stereotype measures. Together, these studies have made significant progress in advancing our understanding of whether, and under what conditions, gender stereotypes may affect the vote. Yet, these questions merit further investigation if we are to understand more precisely how candidate gender shapes electoral behavior. In particular, further analysis of the individual’s vote decision is needed in order to understand the link between stereotypes and voting behavior. In a previous paper, I argued that voter stereotypes are significant because they lead many voters to have a baseline gender preference, or underlying predisposition, to vote for male or female candidates. All else equal, some voters would rather vote for female candidates and be represented by a woman while others would rather vote for male candidates and be represented by a man (Sanbonmatsu 2002). In this paper, I analyze a unique dataset that includes both the baseline gender preference measure and vote choice questions. I examine the hypothesis that the baseline gender preference is related to the vote in races featuring one man and one woman, but not in races where both candidates are men. In contrast to same-gender contests, races involving a female candidate and male opponent provide an opportunity for voters to act on their baseline gender

Authors: Sanbonmatsu, Kira.
first   previous   Page 2 of 23   next   last



background image
Candidate Gender and Voting in Statewide Elections: Evidence from Ohio
What is the significance of candidate gender for American elections? Because most
aggregate studies have found that women and men win their races at similar rates on average, many
scholars have assumed that voters’ gender stereotypes are inconsequential. However, these
assumptions have not usually been tested empirically. The dearth of public opinion surveys that
include both individual-level stereotype measures and vote choice questions have made studying
these questions more difficult. As a result, some studies have examined the effects of stereotypes
on hypothetical vote questions. Other scholars have modeled voting behavior but without the
benefit of gender stereotype measures. Together, these studies have made significant progress in
advancing our understanding of whether, and under what conditions, gender stereotypes may affect
the vote. Yet, these questions merit further investigation if we are to understand more precisely
how candidate gender shapes electoral behavior. In particular, further analysis of the individual’s
vote decision is needed in order to understand the link between stereotypes and voting behavior.
In a previous paper, I argued that voter stereotypes are significant because they lead many
voters to have a baseline gender preference, or underlying predisposition, to vote for male or
female candidates. All else equal, some voters would rather vote for female candidates and be
represented by a woman while others would rather vote for male candidates and be represented by a
man (Sanbonmatsu 2002). In this paper, I analyze a unique dataset that includes both the baseline
gender preference measure and vote choice questions. I examine the hypothesis that the baseline
gender preference is related to the vote in races featuring one man and one woman, but not in races
where both candidates are men. In contrast to same-gender contests, races involving a female
candidate and male opponent provide an opportunity for voters to act on their baseline gender


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 23   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.