 |
Candidate Gender and Voting in Statewide Elections: Evidence from Ohio
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
22
Table 6. Vote Choice for Ohio Supreme Court
Model 1
Model 2
1
Model 3
2
Female-
Female
Male-
Female
Female-
Female
Male-
Female
Female-
Female
Male-
Female
Baseline gender preference
-.113
(.301)
.467
(.293)
-.322
(.341)
.261
(.330)
-.094
(.330)
.541
a
(.316)
Party identification
-.638**
(.124)
-.590**
(.121)
-.672**
(.137)
-.685**
(.141)
-.641**
(.139)
-.562**
(.138)
Vote for governor
.862
(.544)
1.246*
(.507)
.757
(.592)
1.055*
(.516)
.730
(.572)
1.025
a
(.570)
Intercept
2.079**
(.748)
1.862**
(.706)
1.130
(1.534)
2.689
a
(1.625)
3.679*
(1.699)
4.165*
(1.781)
n
171
184
167
179
154 167
χ
2
92.52**
(3 df)
99.05**
(3 df)
94.13**
(8 df)
103.69**
(8 df)
82.53**
(8 df)
90.42**
(8 df)
Initial
log
likelihood -116.98 -125.08 -113.56 -121.71 -105.44 -113.88
Final
log
likelihood -70.71 -75.56 -66.50 -69.87 -64.18 -68.67
a
p
≤
.10, * p
≤
.05, ** p
≤
.01
Note: Cell entries are estimates from a logistic regression model with standard errors in parentheses. The dependent variable is coded 1 for Republican and 0 for Democrat. The baseline preference is coded 1 for prefer a woman, 0 for neutral, and –1 for prefer a man. Party identification is coded 1 through 7 from strong Republican to strong Democrat. Vote for governor is coded 1 for Republican, 0 for Democrat.
1
Model 2 includes controls for gender, age, education, religiosity, and race.
2
Model 3 includes controls for government spending, abortion, whether change is needed in politics,
political knowledge, and attention to the election. Source: TOPS 2002.
|
| | Authors: Sanbonmatsu, Kira. |
|
| |
|
|
22
Table 6. Vote Choice for Ohio Supreme Court
Model 1
Model 2
1
Model 3
2
Female-
Female
Male-
Female
Female-
Female
Male-
Female
Female-
Female
Male-
Female
Baseline gender preference
-.113
(.301)
.467
(.293)
-.322
(.341)
.261
(.330)
-.094
(.330)
.541
a
(.316)
Party identification
-.638**
(.124)
-.590**
(.121)
-.672**
(.137)
-.685**
(.141)
-.641**
(.139)
-.562**
(.138)
Vote for governor
.862
(.544)
1.246*
(.507)
.757
(.592)
1.055*
(.516)
.730
(.572)
1.025
a
(.570)
Intercept
2.079**
(.748)
1.862**
(.706)
1.130
(1.534)
2.689
a
(1.625)
3.679*
(1.699)
4.165*
(1.781)
n
171
184
167
179
154 167
χ
2
92.52**
(3 df)
99.05**
(3 df)
94.13**
(8 df)
103.69**
(8 df)
82.53**
(8 df)
90.42**
(8 df)
Initial
log
likelihood -116.98 -125.08 -113.56 -121.71 -105.44 -113.88
Final
log
likelihood -70.71 -75.56 -66.50 -69.87 -64.18 -68.67
a
p
≤
.10, * p
≤
.05, ** p
≤
.01
Note: Cell entries are estimates from a logistic regression model with standard errors in parentheses. The dependent variable is coded 1 for Republican and 0 for Democrat. The baseline preference is coded 1 for prefer a woman, 0 for neutral, and –1 for prefer a man. Party identification is coded 1 through 7 from strong Republican to strong Democrat. Vote for governor is coded 1 for Republican, 0 for Democrat.
1
Model 2 includes controls for gender, age, education, religiosity, and race.
2
Model 3 includes controls for government spending, abortion, whether change is needed in politics,
political knowledge, and attention to the election. Source: TOPS 2002.
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|