All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Vote by Mail: Voter Preferences and Self-Reported Voting Behavior
Unformatted Document Text:  13 References Berinsky, Adam, Nancy Burns, and Michael W. Traugott. (2001). “Who Votes by Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 178-197. Elazar, Daniel. (1984). American Federalism: A View from the States. 3 rd ed. New York: Harper & Row. Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2001). “Absentee Voting, Mobilization, and Participation.” American Politics Research 29:183-195. Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2000). “Going Postal: How All-Mail Elections Influence Turnout.” Political Behavior 22: 223-239. Oregon Annual Social Indicators Survey. (2003). Oregon Survey Research Laboratory, University of Oregon.. Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (1997) “Survey of Vote-by-Mail Senate Election in the State of Oregon,” PS: Political Science and Politics 91: 53-57. Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (2000) “Does Changing the Rules Change the Players? Vote-by-Mail and the Composition of the Electorate,” Social Science Quarterly 81: 837-845. Traugott, Michael. W. (1996). Report on the Characteristics of the Oregon Electorate Participating in the Special General Election for the U.S. Senate on January 30, 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

Authors: Southwell, Priscilla.
first   previous   Page 14 of 14   next   last



background image
13
References

Berinsky, Adam, Nancy Burns, and Michael W. Traugott. (2001). “Who Votes by Mail?
A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail
Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65: 178-197.
Elazar, Daniel. (1984). American Federalism: A View from the States. 3
rd
ed. New York:
Harper & Row.
Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2001). “Absentee Voting, Mobilization, and
Participation.”
American Politics Research 29:183-195.
Karp, Jeffery A and Susan A. Banducci. (2000). “Going Postal: How All-Mail
Elections
Influence
Turnout.”
Political Behavior 22: 223-239.
Oregon Annual Social Indicators Survey. (2003). Oregon Survey Research Laboratory,
University of Oregon..
Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (1997) “Survey of Vote-by-Mail Senate
Election in the State of Oregon,” PS: Political Science and Politics 91: 53-57.
Southwell, Priscilla L. and Justin Burchett. (2000) “Does Changing the Rules Change the
Players? Vote-by-Mail and the Composition of the Electorate,” Social Science
Quarterly 81: 837-845.
Traugott, Michael. W. (1996). Report on the Characteristics of the Oregon Electorate
Participating in the Special General Election for the U.S. Senate on January 30,
1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 14 of 14   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.