All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

POLICY SUBSTANCE IN THE PUBLIC MIND: The Issue Structure of Mass Politics
Unformatted Document Text:  9 testing the assertion that dual or multiple dimensions within one of our major policy domains could actually be collapsed to a single dimension. Either way, confirmatory analyses were conducted for all domains in all years when there were at least four items available per domain. (CFA models are saturated with three items or less, and cannot produce fit statistics.) The result has the extra presentational advantage of generating issue structures (and subsequent voting models) in figurative form. Note three aspects of this presentation, in particular (Figures 1ff.): • Since the latent factors would not perfectly explain the observed variables even in theory, the small ellipses in these diagrams represent errors in predicting the observed variables from the postulated solution. • The number on each path between a factor and an observed variable is the standardized regression coefficient that results from regressing the observed indicator onto the factor. • The number at the top of each rectangle (or ellipse, if a first-order factor is hypothesized to be caused by another factor) is the squared multiple correlation between the variable and the factor or factors that are hypothesized to have produced it. Said differently, this is the proportion of the variance in the issue variable that is explained by the factors or factors that generated it. AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structures), a modeling program for structural equations, was used to estimate the confirmatory factor analyses as well as the voting models. (For greater details on this specific analysis, see Claggett and Shafer 2002.) An important advantage of AMOS is that it uses full-information maximum-likelihood estimation in the presence of missing data. This is a much better means of handling this problem than the usual strategy of list-wise deletion. Structural equation models have the additional advantage of being able to test how well postulated structures—in our case, both the within-domain and the cross-domain issue structures, plus the vote choice

Authors: Claggett, William. and Shafer, Byron.
first   previous   Page 9 of 70   next   last



background image
9
testing the assertion that dual or multiple dimensions within one of our major policy
domains could actually be collapsed to a single dimension. Either way, confirmatory
analyses were conducted for all domains in all years when there were at least four items
available per domain. (CFA models are saturated with three items or less, and cannot
produce fit statistics.)
The result has the extra presentational advantage of generating issue structures
(and subsequent voting models) in figurative form. Note three aspects of this
presentation, in particular (Figures 1ff.):
Since the latent factors would not perfectly explain the observed variables
even in theory, the small ellipses in these diagrams represent errors in predicting
the observed variables from the postulated solution.
The number on each path between a factor and an observed variable is the
standardized regression coefficient that results from regressing the observed
indicator onto the factor.
The number at the top of each rectangle (or ellipse, if a first-order factor is
hypothesized to be caused by another factor) is the squared multiple correlation
between the variable and the factor or factors that are hypothesized to have
produced it. Said differently, this is the proportion of the variance in the issue
variable that is explained by the factors or factors that generated it.
AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structures), a modeling program for structural
equations, was used to estimate the confirmatory factor analyses as well as the voting
models. (For greater details on this specific analysis, see Claggett and Shafer 2002.) An
important advantage of AMOS is that it uses full-information maximum-likelihood
estimation in the presence of missing data. This is a much better means of handling this
problem than the usual strategy of list-wise deletion. Structural equation models have the
additional advantage of being able to test how well postulated structures—in our case,
both the within-domain and the cross-domain issue structures, plus the vote choice


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 70   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.