All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Making a Connection: Repetition in Campaigns and the Development of Candidate-Issue Connections
Unformatted Document Text:  References Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Berinsky, Adam J. and Donald R. Kinder. 2001. “Making Sense of Issues through Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis.” Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University. Carsey, Thomas M. 2000. Campaign Dynamics: The Race for Governor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Enelow, James M. and Melvin J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Franklin, Charles H. 2001. “Pre-election Polls in Nation and State: A Dynamic Bayesian Hierarchical Model.” Prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Society forPolitical Methodology, Atlanta, GA. Goldstein, Kenneth, Michael Franz, and Travis Ridout. 2002. “Political Advertising in 2000.” Combined file [dataset]. Final release. Madison, WI: The Department of PoliticalScience at The University of Wisconsin-Madison and The Brennan Center for Justice atNew York University. Hammond, Thomas H. and Brian D. Humes. 1993. “‘What This Campaign Is All about Is...’: A Rational Choice Alternative to the Downsian Spatial Model of Elections.” InInformation, Participation, and Choice, ed. Bernard Grofman. Ann Arbor: Universityof Michigan Press. Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Huckfeldt, Robert. 1984. “Political Loyalties and Social Class Ties: The Mechanisms of Contextual Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 399-417. Huckfeldt, Robert and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. NY: Cambridge University Press. Iyengar, Shanto and Donald Kinder. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The use of private polls in Kennedy’s 1960 presidential campaign.” American PoliticalScience Review 88: 527-540. Johnston, Richard, Andre Blais, Henry E. Brady, and Jean Crete. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Johnston, Richard, Michael G. Hagen and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2001. “Dynamics of the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Evidence from the Annenberg Survey.” Prepared forpresentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, SanFrancisco, CA. Lau, Richard R. 1995. “Information Search during an Elecion Campaign: Introducing a Processing-Tracing Methodology for Political Scientists.” In Milton Lodge and KathleenM. McGraw (eds), Political Judgment: Structure and Process. Ann Arbor: Universityof Michigan Press. Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 27

Authors: Claibourn, Michele.
first   previous   Page 29 of 34   next   last



background image
References
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan
Press.
Berinsky, Adam J. and Donald R. Kinder. 2001. “Making Sense of Issues through Frames:
Understanding the Kosovo Crisis.” Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
Carsey, Thomas M. 2000.
Campaign Dynamics: The Race for Governor.
Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
Enelow, James M. and Melvin J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Franklin, Charles H. 2001. “Pre-election Polls in Nation and State: A Dynamic Bayesian
Hierarchical Model.” Prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for
Political Methodology, Atlanta, GA.
Goldstein, Kenneth, Michael Franz, and Travis Ridout. 2002. “Political Advertising in
2000.” Combined file [dataset]. Final release. Madison, WI: The Department of Political
Science at The University of Wisconsin-Madison and The Brennan Center for Justice at
New York University.
Hammond, Thomas H. and Brian D. Humes. 1993. “‘What This Campaign Is All about
Is...’: A Rational Choice Alternative to the Downsian Spatial Model of Elections.” In
Information, Participation, and Choice, ed. Bernard Grofman. Ann Arbor: University
of Michigan Press.
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1984. “Political Loyalties and Social Class Ties: The Mechanisms of
Contextual Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 399-417.
Huckfeldt, Robert and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication:
Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Iyengar, Shanto and Donald Kinder. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming:
The use of private polls in Kennedy’s 1960 presidential campaign.” American Political
Science Review 88: 527-540.
Johnston, Richard, Andre Blais, Henry E. Brady, and Jean Crete. 1992. Letting the People
Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Johnston, Richard, Michael G. Hagen and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2001. “Dynamics of
the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Evidence from the Annenberg Survey.” Prepared for
presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San
Francisco, CA.
Lau, Richard R. 1995. “Information Search during an Elecion Campaign: Introducing a
Processing-Tracing Methodology for Political Scientists.” In Milton Lodge and Kathleen
M. McGraw (eds), Political Judgment: Structure and Process. Ann Arbor: University
of Michigan Press.
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can citizens
learn what they need to know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 34   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.