All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Rational Expectations in the 2000 Presidential Primaries
Unformatted Document Text:  39 References Abramowitz, Alan I. 1989. "Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a Presidential Primary Election: A Test of Competing Models." Journal of Politics 51:977-92. Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, Phil Paolino, and David Rohde. 1992. "'Sophisticated' Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries." American Political Science Review 86:55-69. Bartels, Larry M. 1987. "Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nominating Process." American Journal of Political Science 31 (February):1-30. Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Duch, Raymond M., Harvey D. Palmer, and Christopher J. Anderson. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 635-652. Enders, Walter. 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Enders, Walter, and Todd Sandler. 1993. “The Effectiveness of Antiterrorism Policies: A Vector-Autoregression-Intervention Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87: 829-844. Graber, Doris A. 1997. Mass Media and American Politics, 5 th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Haller, H. Brandon. and Helmut Norpoth. 1994. “Let the Good Times Roll: The Economic Expectations of U.S. Voters.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 625-50. Haynes, Audrey A., and Paul-Henri Gurian. 1993. “Campaign Strategy in Presidential Primaries, 1976-88.” American Journal of Political Science 37:335-341. Haynes, Audrey A. and Staci L. Rhine. 1998. "Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated Negative Messages Against Opponents." Political Research Quarterly 51: 691- 721. Krause, George A. and Jim Granato. 1998. “Fooling Some of the Public Some of the Time? A Test for Weak Rationality with Heterogeneous Information Levels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 135-151.

Authors: Farrell, Christian.
first   previous   Page 39 of 40   next   last



background image
39
References
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1989. "Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a
Presidential Primary Election: A Test of Competing Models." Journal of Politics
51:977-92.
Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, Phil Paolino, and David Rohde. 1992.
"'Sophisticated' Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries." American Political
Science
Review 86:55-69.
Bartels, Larry M. 1987. "Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential
Nominating
Process."
American Journal of Political Science 31 (February):1-30.
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Duch, Raymond M., Harvey D. Palmer, and Christopher J. Anderson. 2000.
“Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American
Journal of Political Science 44: 635-652.

Enders, Walter. 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley and
Sons.

Enders, Walter, and Todd Sandler. 1993. “The Effectiveness of Antiterrorism Policies: A
Vector-Autoregression-Intervention
Analysis.”
American Political Science
Review 87: 829-844.

Graber, Doris A. 1997. Mass Media and American Politics, 5
th
ed. Washington, DC: CQ
Press.

Haller, H. Brandon. and Helmut Norpoth. 1994. “Let the Good Times Roll: The
Economic Expectations of U.S. Voters.” American Journal of Political Science
38:
625-50.

Haynes, Audrey A., and Paul-Henri Gurian. 1993. “Campaign Strategy in Presidential
Primaries,
1976-88.”
American Journal of Political Science 37:335-341.

Haynes, Audrey A. and Staci L. Rhine. 1998. "Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination
Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated
Negative Messages Against Opponents." Political Research Quarterly 51: 691-
721.

Krause, George A. and Jim Granato. 1998. “Fooling Some of the Public Some of the
Time? A Test for Weak Rationality with Heterogeneous Information Levels.”
Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 135-151.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 39 of 40   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.