All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

I'm Changing the Climate! Ask Me How!: The Politics of the Anti-SUV Campaign
Unformatted Document Text:  3 changes are in the works, while others, such as getting Americans to choose smaller vehicles, are difficult to imagine. As one commentator said, “What a lot of protestors are missing is that Americans have a deep psychological connection to the SUV. American automotive life is about mobility and freedom. SUVs give you freedom, in a psychological sense, one that isn’t necessarily rational, but is emotional” (Marsden, qtd. in Guthrie 2003, B1). The anti-SUV campaign is another example of the politicization of private citizen behavior, a topic recently reviewed by Kersh and Morone (2002) in their analysis of the politics of obesity. The campaign resembles the public health movements investigated by Kersh and Morone and with other so-called “moral reform movements” (Hunt 1999). Like the consumption of alcohol, tobacco, or fatty foods, the consumption of SUVs has been problematized in both moral and utilitarian terms by a small group of activists who express alarm at the growing popularity of these vehicles. The political significance of the campaign lies in the fact that, like other moral reform movements, “it provides for a variety of different social forces to articulate projects outside the mainstream of official politics and state institutions” (Hunt 1999, 2). Beyond the mere articulation of grievances, however, the movement has the potential to affect policy, albeit its impact has been limited to date. Even absent a significant policy impact, the movement is worth studying for the underlying tensions it uncovers in American politics. This paper has three goals. First, I provide an overview of the anti-SUV movement. This discussion is largely descriptive, with some attempt to analyze the origins of the movement and the windows of opportunity that have led to its expansion. The second goal is to examine the anti-SUV campaign in light of its similarities and differences with other attempts in American politics to govern private behavior. I argue that the anti-SUV campaign is a close relative of other moral reform movements in the United States, particularly those aimed at controlling the

Authors: Pralle, Sarah.
first   previous   Page 3 of 32   next   last



background image
3
changes are in the works, while others, such as getting Americans to choose smaller vehicles, are
difficult to imagine. As one commentator said, “What a lot of protestors are missing is that
Americans have a deep psychological connection to the SUV. American automotive life is about
mobility and freedom. SUVs give you freedom, in a psychological sense, one that isn’t
necessarily rational, but is emotional” (Marsden, qtd. in Guthrie 2003, B1).
The anti-SUV campaign is another example of the politicization of private citizen
behavior, a topic recently reviewed by Kersh and Morone (2002) in their analysis of the politics
of obesity. The campaign resembles the public health movements investigated by Kersh and
Morone and with other so-called “moral reform movements” (Hunt 1999). Like the consumption
of alcohol, tobacco, or fatty foods, the consumption of SUVs has been problematized in both
moral and utilitarian terms by a small group of activists who express alarm at the growing
popularity of these vehicles. The political significance of the campaign lies in the fact that, like
other moral reform movements, “it provides for a variety of different social forces to articulate
projects outside the mainstream of official politics and state institutions” (Hunt 1999, 2). Beyond
the mere articulation of grievances, however, the movement has the potential to affect policy,
albeit its impact has been limited to date. Even absent a significant policy impact, the movement
is worth studying for the underlying tensions it uncovers in American politics.
This paper has three goals. First, I provide an overview of the anti-SUV movement. This
discussion is largely descriptive, with some attempt to analyze the origins of the movement and
the windows of opportunity that have led to its expansion. The second goal is to examine the
anti-SUV campaign in light of its similarities and differences with other attempts in American
politics to govern private behavior. I argue that the anti-SUV campaign is a close relative of
other moral reform movements in the United States, particularly those aimed at controlling the


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 32   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.