Table 3: Support for Nordic Political Parties. QCA and logistic regression
CC
Sweden Norway Finland
Iceland
Denmark
Environm.
QCA
n.s.
–
hEif
n.s.
n.s.
LR
n.s.
–
-H
-F
n.s.
n.s.
Liberal
QCA h
n.s.
hEif
hei
n.s.
h ( eif + EIF )
LR
n.s.
-H
-I
+HI
n.s. -H
Left Soc.
QCA
hE
hEi
hEif
hE ( iF + If )
–
hEi
LR
+E -HE
-H -I
+E
–
-H +E -I
Soc. Dem.
QCA
Eif
n.s.
E ( hIf + HiF )
h ( if + EF )
HE ( if + IF )
LR
+E
-I
n.s.
+F -HI
-H +E -I +HI
+E -I
Conserv.
QCA
eI
eI ( f + hF )
eIf
eI ( f + hF )
eI ( f + HF )
eIf
LR
-E
-E +I +HE
-E +I -IF
-E +I -HF
-E +I -HI
-E
Progress 1
QCA
–
I (hEF + HeF + HEf)
n.s. – n.s.
LR
–
+I
+F
n.s. – n.s.
Agrarian
QCA
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
e (hF + hif + If)
LR
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
-E +H +I -HI +EI
NOTE: The Christrian peoples parties and the Danish People's Party (Pia Kjærsgaard; Progress 2) are not
included in the table due to the statistcally insignificant results for the parties in question. Signs have been
consistently added to all logistic coefficients so as not to confuse them with QCA conditions.
LEGEND: '–' party does not exist and/or is not included in survey. n.s. - Non-significant model/s and/or result/s for
both methods. QCA uppercase: a condition is supported/present; OCA lowercase: a condition is rejected/absent.
H/h – hierarchy; E/e – egalitarianism; I/i – individualism; F/f – fatalism. QCA: Qualitative Comparative Analysis;
LR: Logistic regression. CC - common party family condition.
DATA source and methodology, see text.
29
Convention