All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Oligarchs and Democrats: Russians Confront Emerging Inequality
Unformatted Document Text:  Oligarchs and Democrats, page 27 hard to say yes or no, because many factors influence it. Simply there are examples, when people are sufficiently educated and have specialties but cannot find applications for their abilities. There are quite a few examples.” Market doubters were more likely to focus on those examples where hard work was not enough, but even among those who showed little support for markets there were quite a few people who thought significant opportunities existed. Among skeptics, people were more likely to think opportunities existed than that they did not. Pelageia, for instance, felt that as a pensioner she had few opportunities, but she seized the ones she could find and admonished others to do the same. She supplemented her pension by selling plastic bags in the market, and spoke with some heat about the necessity for young people to look for better jobs. She said, “Young people stand with us—young people, around twenty years old, selling shopping bags. We tell them, ‘Girls, you can go to work. Well, okay, we stand there, pensioners. They already won’t take us anywhere…But you are young. Go and work. Why are you standing here? You need a steady job. You need to work for your interests. But you stand here with the old women, stand with these plastic bags…Why aren’t you ashamed?’” Even Zinaida, a stressed, overwhelmed employee of a barely operating defense-related factory, thought that people could improve their own material positions by selling privately the goods produced in their factories. Among market skeptics, it was particularly those of a more democratic leaning who saw severe limits in the opportunities markets provide. While a couple market-doubting democrats thought hard work was enough to push the ambitious ahead, most noted the importance of other qualities: working outside the public sphere, being able to see opportunities as well as being young enough to seize them, having an ability to do something that someone needs, living in an area where good jobs existed. Nadezhda commented, “Doctors are poor, no matter how hard they work. Well, that’s the government budget sphere. Everything depends on where you work.” Asked whether a person could improve his or her material situation through hard work, Dima replied, “Well, theoretically yes, of course. Theoretically. But at the same time, the majority of people who don’t know how to work well may earn more than this person. And society doesn’t always help him. Sometimes it gets in the way.” Anya noted that “it is not enough to know how to work. It is necessary to have other qualities: assertiveness, maybe, and impudence.” The kinds of doubts expressed by market-skeptical democrats tended to be broader and more systemic than the ones expressed by less democratic market skeptics. For instance, the less democratic skeptics often complained about the limits of their own particular jobs or the injustice of their own situations. Nadia noted that she worked well but nonetheless was paid less than the government-calculated minimum for survival. Inna complained, “I have

Authors: Carnaghan, Ellen.
first   previous   Page 29 of 39   next   last



background image
Oligarchs and Democrats, page 27
hard to say yes or no, because many factors influence it. Simply there are examples, when
people are sufficiently educated and have specialties but cannot find applications for their
abilities. There are quite a few examples.” Market doubters were more likely to focus on those
examples where hard work was not enough, but even among those who showed little support
for markets there were quite a few people who thought significant opportunities existed. Among
skeptics, people were more likely to think opportunities existed than that they did not. Pelageia,
for instance, felt that as a pensioner she had few opportunities, but she seized the ones she
could find and admonished others to do the same. She supplemented her pension by selling
plastic bags in the market, and spoke with some heat about the necessity for young people to
look for better jobs. She said, “Young people stand with us—young people, around twenty years
old, selling shopping bags. We tell them, ‘Girls, you can go to work. Well, okay, we stand there,
pensioners. They already won’t take us anywhere…But you are young. Go and work. Why are
you standing here? You need a steady job. You need to work for your interests. But you stand
here with the old women, stand with these plastic bags…Why aren’t you ashamed?’” Even
Zinaida, a stressed, overwhelmed employee of a barely operating defense-related factory,
thought that people could improve their own material positions by selling privately the goods
produced in their factories.
Among market skeptics, it was particularly those of a more democratic leaning who saw
severe limits in the opportunities markets provide. While a couple market-doubting democrats
thought hard work was enough to push the ambitious ahead, most noted the importance of
other qualities: working outside the public sphere, being able to see opportunities as well as
being young enough to seize them, having an ability to do something that someone needs,
living in an area where good jobs existed. Nadezhda commented, “Doctors are poor, no matter
how hard they work. Well, that’s the government budget sphere. Everything depends on where
you work.” Asked whether a person could improve his or her material situation through hard
work, Dima replied, “Well, theoretically yes, of course. Theoretically. But at the same time, the
majority of people who don’t know how to work well may earn more than this person. And
society doesn’t always help him. Sometimes it gets in the way.” Anya noted that “it is not
enough to know how to work. It is necessary to have other qualities: assertiveness, maybe, and
impudence.” The kinds of doubts expressed by market-skeptical democrats tended to be
broader and more systemic than the ones expressed by less democratic market skeptics. For
instance, the less democratic skeptics often complained about the limits of their own particular
jobs or the injustice of their own situations. Nadia noted that she worked well but nonetheless
was paid less than the government-calculated minimum for survival. Inna complained, “I have


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 39   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.