All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Election Observers, Election Boycotts, and Competition: Do International Observers Increase the Chances that an Opposition Party Will Boycott the Election?
Unformatted Document Text:  Beaulieu and Hyde 1 Introduction Domestic factors are thought to be the primary determinants of the decision by a political party to orchestrate a nationwide election boycott. This decision can be determined by the party’s chances at gaining seats, the possibility of forgone public financing of their party, the wealth and size of the country, the level of political violence and intimidation of party candidates, and the level of competition in the electoral system. Receiving less attention is the possibility that the decision by a party to boycott is also influenced by the presence of international attention to the election. While all elections receive some international attention, international election observers (IEOs) have become a direct conduit to increased international attention from the press as well as intergovernmental organizations and major foreign-aid donor states. International observer groups focus international and domestic media attention on the quality of the electoral process during and immediately following an election. During the 1990s in particular, international pressure influenced many leaders in developing democracies as they struggled to conform to the standards of “good governance” set forth by international financial institutions, intergovernmental organizations, and other developed democratic governments. This paper will explore whether the presence of international election observers decreases the probability of a party election boycott by increasing confidence that the election will be free and fair (as the traditional wisdom suggests), or increases the probability of an election boycott by providing boycotting parties with an increased ability to discredit incumbents through a direct connection to international audiences and thus foreign aid donors, who may be more effective in pressuring incumbents for reform. The proportions of boycotted elections and internationally observed elections have increased steadily throughout the 1990s, yet to date, these trends have only been studied in

Authors: Hyde, Susan.
first   previous   Page 2 of 30   next   last



background image
Beaulieu and Hyde 1
Introduction
Domestic factors are thought to be the primary determinants of the decision by a political
party to orchestrate a nationwide election boycott. This decision can be determined by the party’s
chances at gaining seats, the possibility of forgone public financing of their party, the wealth and
size of the country, the level of political violence and intimidation of party candidates, and the
level of competition in the electoral system. Receiving less attention is the possibility that the
decision by a party to boycott is also influenced by the presence of international attention to the
election. While all elections receive some international attention, international election observers
(IEOs) have become a direct conduit to increased international attention from the press as well as
intergovernmental organizations and major foreign-aid donor states. International observer
groups focus international and domestic media attention on the quality of the electoral process
during and immediately following an election. During the 1990s in particular, international
pressure influenced many leaders in developing democracies as they struggled to conform to the
standards of “good governance” set forth by international financial institutions,
intergovernmental organizations, and other developed democratic governments.
This paper will explore whether the presence of international election observers decreases
the probability of a party election boycott by increasing confidence that the election will be free
and fair (as the traditional wisdom suggests), or increases the probability of an election boycott
by providing boycotting parties with an increased ability to discredit incumbents through a direct
connection to international audiences and thus foreign aid donors, who may be more effective in
pressuring incumbents for reform.
The proportions of boycotted elections and internationally observed elections have
increased steadily throughout the 1990s, yet to date, these trends have only been studied in


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 30   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.