All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Of Voters and Vadim: A Historical and Regional Perspective on Party Accountability and Anti-System Proespects in Romania's 2004 Elections
Unformatted Document Text:  2 Why should we care about political parties and accountability in Romania? The reason is not just Vadim Tudor and PRM’s 2000 success, or functionalist justifications for the puzzle of how elections or parliament would be organized, let alone aggregate voter interests without parties. Political parties enjoy the least trust of any institution in Romania, securely entrenched at the bottom of the heap in all opinion polls. In May 2004, even the usual suspects among institutions normally targeted for criticism could outdo political parties by a significant margin. Voters trusted, in order, the government, foreign investors, private firms, the justice system, NGOs, Parliament, and trade unions more than they trusted political parties, ranging from 34 percent of voters trusting the government to 23 percent trusting parliament and the trade unions. By comparison, Romanian political parties earned a measly 15 percent trust level among voters in May 2004, which was an improvement over the 8 percent they held in October 2003, or more pointedly, in November 2000 (around the time of the national elections) as well. 1 Two years ago, in October 2002, forty-eight percent of Romanians polled did not feel represented by any political party, 2 and one year ago, in October 2003, a third of Romanians opined that it would be good that there exist a single party. 3 Twenty-two percent of Romanians surveyed that same year would like to have a military regime, while no less than 84 percent agree that “Romania needs a powerful leader who would make order in the country.” 4 Even beyond that: 25 percent of those polled in May 2004 are dissatisfied by democracy in Romania, and another 34 percent are neither dissatisfied nor satisfied by democracy. 5 That is hardly an overwhelming vote of approval by nearly sixty percent of the population for what I have labeled elsewhere as “really existing democracy.” 6 I do not mean to overstate the case: Romania is not in danger of democratic collapse just yet, and some of those “democracy fence-sitters” would probably miss what democracy there is if a truly authoritarian government were to come to power. However, the

Authors: Sellin, Frank.
first   previous   Page 2 of 40   next   last



background image
2
Why should we care about political parties and accountability in Romania? The reason is
not just Vadim Tudor and PRM’s 2000 success, or functionalist justifications for the puzzle of
how elections or parliament would be organized, let alone aggregate voter interests without
parties. Political parties enjoy the least trust of any institution in Romania, securely entrenched
at the bottom of the heap in all opinion polls. In May 2004, even the usual suspects among
institutions normally targeted for criticism could outdo political parties by a significant margin.
Voters trusted, in order, the government, foreign investors, private firms, the justice system,
NGOs, Parliament, and trade unions more than they trusted political parties, ranging from 34
percent of voters trusting the government to 23 percent trusting parliament and the trade unions.
By comparison, Romanian political parties earned a measly 15 percent trust level among voters
in May 2004, which was an improvement over the 8 percent they held in October 2003, or more
pointedly, in November 2000 (around the time of the national elections) as well.
1
Two years
ago, in October 2002, forty-eight percent of Romanians polled did not feel represented by any
political party,
2
and one year ago, in October 2003, a third of Romanians opined that it would be
good that there exist a single party.
3
Twenty-two percent of Romanians surveyed that same year
would like to have a military regime, while no less than 84 percent agree that “Romania needs a
powerful leader who would make order in the country.”
4
Even beyond that: 25 percent of those
polled in May 2004 are dissatisfied by democracy in Romania, and another 34 percent are neither
dissatisfied nor satisfied by democracy.
5
That is hardly an overwhelming vote of approval by
nearly sixty percent of the population for what I have labeled elsewhere as “really existing
democracy.”
6
I do not mean to overstate the case: Romania is not in danger of democratic
collapse just yet, and some of those “democracy fence-sitters” would probably miss what
democracy there is if a truly authoritarian government were to come to power. However, the


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 40   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.