All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Welfare Reform in An Intergovernmental Context: Devolution in Action?
Unformatted Document Text:  2 Over the past several decades many comparative studies of policy-making in the American states were focused on identifying the factors that determine the differences in state policy outputs (for example, Dye 1966; Cnudde and McCrone 1969; Fry and Winters 1970; Lewis-Beck 1977; Dye 1978). These studies examined the relationships between a variety of system inputs and policy outputs, arguing that as certain inputs - such as the state’s tax base or ideological preferences of the electorate - change there is a corresponding change in state policy outputs such as spending levels on a certain program. These studies provided many interesting findings, such as strong empirical evidence of the relationship between economic realities and state policy choices, and provoked a number of intriguing questions. I argue they also shared three characteristics that can be instructive in an attempt to understand current differences in state policy choices such as state responses to welfare reform. In this paper, I apply these lessons to understanding the different choices states made on the welfare reform plans required by the national government in 1996. The primary tool used to identify any clear patterns of institutional, economic, or political influence on welfare policy-making across the states is a logistic regression analysis of the choices different states made on these welfare reform plans. Lessons from Past Comparative Studies of State Policy-Making The first characteristic these comparative studies of state policy-making shared was a near obsession with judging the relative importance of “politics” and “economics” in the determination of policy outcomes. “Politics” refers to characteristics of state political systems such as party competition, voter participation, and Democratic or Republican control of the state’s legislative and executive branches. “Economics” refers to the state’s economic condition at the time of the policy-decision and is usually represented in these studies by measures of per capita income, urbanization and industrialization. For example, the first such studies (for

Authors: Meinke, Timothy.
first   previous   Page 2 of 37   next   last



background image
2
Over the past several decades many comparative studies of policy-making in the
American states were focused on identifying the factors that determine the differences in state
policy outputs (for example, Dye 1966; Cnudde and McCrone 1969; Fry and Winters 1970;
Lewis-Beck 1977; Dye 1978).
These studies examined the relationships between a variety of
system inputs and policy outputs, arguing that as certain inputs - such as the state’s tax base or
ideological preferences of the electorate - change there is a corresponding change in state policy
outputs such as spending levels on a certain program. These studies provided many interesting
findings, such as strong empirical evidence of the relationship between economic realities and
state policy choices, and provoked a number of intriguing questions. I argue they also shared
three characteristics that can be instructive in an attempt to understand current differences in
state policy choices such as state responses to welfare reform. In this paper, I apply these lessons
to understanding the different choices states made on the welfare reform plans required by the
national government in 1996. The primary tool used to identify any clear patterns of
institutional, economic, or political influence on welfare policy-making across the states is a
logistic regression analysis of the choices different states made on these welfare reform plans.
Lessons from Past Comparative Studies of State Policy-Making
The first characteristic these comparative studies of state policy-making shared was a
near obsession with judging the relative importance of “politics” and “economics” in the
determination of policy outcomes. “Politics” refers to characteristics of state political systems
such as party competition, voter participation, and Democratic or Republican control of the
state’s legislative and executive branches. “Economics” refers to the state’s economic condition
at the time of the policy-decision and is usually represented in these studies by measures of per
capita income, urbanization and industrialization. For example, the first such studies (for


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.