All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Selling The City: Institutional Change and the Significance of City County Consolidation
Unformatted Document Text:  28 It was apparent that drawing a single jurisdictional line around the county would not change the size of Louisville’s metropolitan population. Merged or unmerged metro Louisville would stay the same, yet city size remained the centerpiece of the campaign. When presented with uncertain data between economic development and consolidation, UNITY tried (unsuccessfully) to prove otherwise. When shown that the fastest growing areas in the state were in fragmented Northern Kentucky, UNITY insisted that Indianapolis or Nashville were the true models. 12 When shown that conditions in Indianapolis and Nashville were different––that among other things these cities were state capitals where employment had grown by 63 percent over comparable cities––UNITY pointed to the ability of those cities to retain existing population. When shown that Indianapolis and Nashville were not really retaining population and settlement had spread beyond consolidation lines, UNITY pointed to the “intangible benefits” of merger (Courier Journal, September 14, 1999; Courier Journal, November 5, 2000). Notwithstanding the argument for “intangible benefits”, advocates went to surprising lengths to establish that consolidation would turn up something solid. A former deputy mayor, who had moved on to work for GLI, clamed the city had lost its bid to attract the Houston Rockets basketball team because Louisville was split between city and county leadership (Summers, October 8, 2000 p. D1). Further examination revealed that Houston had simply offered the Rockets a better deal (Houston Chronicle, July 1, 2000 p. A 33). . Beyond the rhetoric there was something to be gained through realignment. Putting the area’s numerous agencies under a single person would vastly increase the mayor’s powers over budget and personnel. Economic development was already contracted out to GLI, but merger would greatly increase its scope of operation. Development could more easily be undertaken anywhere in the county and without securing the approval of three county commissioners. While

Authors: Savitch, H.V.. and Vogel, Ronald.
first   previous   Page 29 of 47   next   last



background image
28
It was apparent that drawing a single jurisdictional line around the county would not
change the size of Louisville’s metropolitan population. Merged or unmerged metro Louisville
would stay the same, yet city size remained the centerpiece of the campaign. When presented
with uncertain data between economic development and consolidation, UNITY tried
(unsuccessfully) to prove otherwise. When shown that the fastest growing areas in the state were
in fragmented Northern Kentucky, UNITY insisted that Indianapolis or Nashville were the true
models.
12
When shown that conditions in Indianapolis and Nashville were different––that
among other things these cities were state capitals where employment had grown by 63 percent
over comparable cities––UNITY pointed to the ability of those cities to retain existing
population. When shown that Indianapolis and Nashville were not really retaining population
and settlement had spread beyond consolidation lines, UNITY pointed to the “intangible
benefits” of merger (Courier Journal, September 14, 1999; Courier Journal, November 5, 2000).
Notwithstanding the argument for “intangible benefits”, advocates went to surprising lengths to
establish that consolidation would turn up something solid. A former deputy mayor, who had
moved on to work for GLI, clamed the city had lost its bid to attract the Houston Rockets
basketball team because Louisville was split between city and county leadership (Summers,
October 8, 2000 p. D1). Further examination revealed that Houston had simply offered the
Rockets a better deal (Houston Chronicle, July 1, 2000 p. A 33). .
Beyond the rhetoric there was something to be gained through realignment. Putting the
area’s numerous agencies under a single person would vastly increase the mayor’s powers over
budget and personnel. Economic development was already contracted out to GLI, but merger
would greatly increase its scope of operation. Development could more easily be undertaken
anywhere in the county and without securing the approval of three county commissioners. While


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 47   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.