 |
Gender Imbalance in Representative Democracy: Women Candidates and Councillors in English Local Government, 1973-2001
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
1
Women and Local Elections
Although women comprise over half of the UK electorate their relatively low level of representation toelected office remains an issue. The House of Commons, elected in 1992, contained just 60 womenMPs, or 9.2 per cent of the total membership. That figure doubled at the 1997 election, falling backslightly to 118 (17.9%) for the current Parliament. The UK is currently ranked 49
th
in the Inter-
Parliamentary Union’s league table of female representation. The situation regarding women’srepresentation for the supra-national European Parliament (EP) is little better and the UK lies belowthe EU average. Following the 1999 EP elections, the first in Britain to use PR-List voting, womenoccupy 21 out of 87 seats, 24.1%, compared with 31% overall for the parliament. Women’srepresentation, however, improves at the sub-national level of government. Currently, approximatelyslightly more than a quarter of local councillors are women, although the proportions vary betweendifferent types of local authority. The statistics appear to confirm the ‘law of minority attrition’, wherebythe proportion of women holding elected office decreases as the perceived importance of politicaloffice increases (Taagepera 1994).
To an extent local government has been enlightened in its attitudes, both in terms of voting rights andallowing women to sit on locally elected bodies. As early as the 1830s, women are able to vote forvarious local boards as long as they are unmarried and pay local taxes. By 1875, some time beforethey are permitted to vote at parliamentary elections, women are successfully standing for election tosuch authorities as Boards of Guardians. Unfortunately, detailed information about the gender ofcandidates contesting these and subsequent local elections is currently unavailable
1
. However one of
the few published studies noted that at the 1964 local elections women candidates comprised about16% of the total and that they did not perform as well as male candidates (Fletcher 1967).
However, following the compilation of comprehensive election results from 1973 onwards it is possibleto analyse different aspects of the change in the proportion of women candidates and councillors overthree decades. Our primary purpose in taking this approach is to identify those factors that appear toexplain why the proportions of women contesting and winning local elections should vary. A review ofexisting research, which is largely, though not exclusively concerned with the issues of women’sunder-representation in national legislatures, will serve to identify the key research questions. Weshall then address some of these questions with specific reference to English local elections heldbetween 1973-2002.
Determinants of women’s (under) representation to elected office
An international comparative analysis of women in national parliaments reveals the importance of arange of political, socio-economic and cultural factors in explaining the relative proportions of electedwomen as well as specific effects associated with voting systems, the strength of left-wing parties andthe timing of women’s suffrage (Kenworthy and Malami 1999). Darcy (Darcy 1992)considers, but thenrejects, two possible explanations for the under-representation of women. First, is there a male-dominated, party establishment conspiracy, to restrict political challenges by women? On thecontrary, the evidence shows that in some countries quotas have been introduced for candidateselection procedures by some party organisations in order to redress gender imbalance (Caul 2001Darcy, 1994). Moreover, it does not appear in any party’s interest to be seen to discriminate againstwomen by only selecting them for the most difficult to win seats, since women in most democraciescomprise a significant proportion of the electorate. Does that mean, therefore, that women fail toachieve equality of representation because of antipathy from voters? Much, though not all, researchevidence shows that voters respond positively towards female candidates (Black and Erickson 2003;Darcy, Welch, and Clark 1994; Kelley and McAllister 1984). This is an area for investigation in theEnglish local government context, although without survey data we shall rely upon elections returns toinform our analysis.
1
The situation is, however, improving. We have published the first four volumes in a series of historical local
elections, which cover the cities of London and Birmingham from the late nineteenth and early twentiethcenturies respectively. Additional volumes are planned because of a grant from the Arts and HumanitiesResearch Board. These will cover post world war two local elections for the major urban areas. In a smallnumber of cases it will be possible to cover elections for more rural authorities.
|
| | Authors: Borisyuk, Galina. and Thrasher, Michael. |
|
| |
|
|
1
Women and Local Elections
Although women comprise over half of the UK electorate their relatively low level of representation to elected office remains an issue. The House of Commons, elected in 1992, contained just 60 women MPs, or 9.2 per cent of the total membership. That figure doubled at the 1997 election, falling back slightly to 118 (17.9%) for the current Parliament. The UK is currently ranked 49
th
in the Inter-
Parliamentary Union’s league table of female representation. The situation regarding women’s representation for the supra-national European Parliament (EP) is little better and the UK lies below the EU average. Following the 1999 EP elections, the first in Britain to use PR-List voting, women occupy 21 out of 87 seats, 24.1%, compared with 31% overall for the parliament. Women’s representation, however, improves at the sub-national level of government. Currently, approximately slightly more than a quarter of local councillors are women, although the proportions vary between different types of local authority. The statistics appear to confirm the ‘law of minority attrition’, whereby the proportion of women holding elected office decreases as the perceived importance of political office increases (Taagepera 1994).
To an extent local government has been enlightened in its attitudes, both in terms of voting rights and allowing women to sit on locally elected bodies. As early as the 1830s, women are able to vote for various local boards as long as they are unmarried and pay local taxes. By 1875, some time before they are permitted to vote at parliamentary elections, women are successfully standing for election to such authorities as Boards of Guardians. Unfortunately, detailed information about the gender of candidates contesting these and subsequent local elections is currently unavailable
1
. However one of
the few published studies noted that at the 1964 local elections women candidates comprised about 16% of the total and that they did not perform as well as male candidates (Fletcher 1967).
However, following the compilation of comprehensive election results from 1973 onwards it is possible to analyse different aspects of the change in the proportion of women candidates and councillors over three decades. Our primary purpose in taking this approach is to identify those factors that appear to explain why the proportions of women contesting and winning local elections should vary. A review of existing research, which is largely, though not exclusively concerned with the issues of women’s under-representation in national legislatures, will serve to identify the key research questions. We shall then address some of these questions with specific reference to English local elections held between 1973-2002.
Determinants of women’s (under) representation to elected office
An international comparative analysis of women in national parliaments reveals the importance of a range of political, socio-economic and cultural factors in explaining the relative proportions of elected women as well as specific effects associated with voting systems, the strength of left-wing parties and the timing of women’s suffrage (Kenworthy and Malami 1999). Darcy (Darcy 1992)considers, but then rejects, two possible explanations for the under-representation of women. First, is there a male- dominated, party establishment conspiracy, to restrict political challenges by women? On the contrary, the evidence shows that in some countries quotas have been introduced for candidate selection procedures by some party organisations in order to redress gender imbalance (Caul 2001 Darcy, 1994). Moreover, it does not appear in any party’s interest to be seen to discriminate against women by only selecting them for the most difficult to win seats, since women in most democracies comprise a significant proportion of the electorate. Does that mean, therefore, that women fail to achieve equality of representation because of antipathy from voters? Much, though not all, research evidence shows that voters respond positively towards female candidates (Black and Erickson 2003; Darcy, Welch, and Clark 1994; Kelley and McAllister 1984). This is an area for investigation in the English local government context, although without survey data we shall rely upon elections returns to inform our analysis.
1
The situation is, however, improving. We have published the first four volumes in a series of historical local
elections, which cover the cities of London and Birmingham from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries respectively. Additional volumes are planned because of a grant from the Arts and Humanities Research Board. These will cover post world war two local elections for the major urban areas. In a small number of cases it will be possible to cover elections for more rural authorities.
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|