All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind
Unformatted Document Text:  28 indeed, to account for most of the net support for the tax cut in the NES sample. 36 The Impact of Political Information So far, I have argued that public support for the Bush tax cuts derives in considerable part from unenlightened considerations of self-interest on the part of people who do not recognize the implications of Bush’s policies for their own economic well-being or their broader political values. Millions of citizens say that the federal government should spend more on a wide variety of programs, that the rich are asked to pay too little in taxes, and that growing economic inequality is a bad thing—but simultaneously support policies whose main effects will be to reduce the tax burden of the rich, constrain funding for government programs, and exacerbate growing economic inequality. One is left to wonder how these people would resolve the contradictions implied by their simultaneous antipathies toward inequality and taxation—if they recognized those contradictions. Elsewhere, I have proposed a way to explore admittedly hypothetical questions of this sort by observing how the political preferences of well-informed citizens differ from those of less- informed citizens who are similar in politically relevant ways (Bartels 1990; along related lines see Bartels 1996; Delli Carpini and Keeter 1996; Fishkin 1997; Gilens 2001). If well-informed citizens have systematically different perceptions and preferences, the logic goes, might not additional information move less-informed citizens in the same directions? In the present context, if well-informed citizens seem to reason differently, draw on different premises, and 36 The sample mean value for the ( − 1 to +1) tax cut variable (excluding respondents who said they “haven’t thought about” whether they favored or opposed it) is .352. Multiplying the sample mean value for Own Tax Burden among these same respondents, .482, by the corresponding parameter estimate in the fourth column of Table 4, .426, accounts for 58% of this net support for repealing the inheritance tax.

Authors: Bartels, Larry.
first   previous   Page 29 of 48   next   last



background image
28
indeed, to account for most of the net support for the tax cut in the NES sample.
36
The Impact of Political Information
So far, I have argued that public support for the Bush tax cuts derives in considerable part
from unenlightened considerations of self-interest on the part of people who do not recognize the
implications of Bush’s policies for their own economic well-being or their broader political
values. Millions of citizens say that the federal government should spend more on a wide variety
of programs, that the rich are asked to pay too little in taxes, and that growing economic
inequality is a bad thing—but simultaneously support policies whose main effects will be to
reduce the tax burden of the rich, constrain funding for government programs, and exacerbate
growing economic inequality. One is left to wonder how these people would resolve the
contradictions implied by their simultaneous antipathies toward inequality and taxation—if they
recognized those contradictions.
Elsewhere, I have proposed a way to explore admittedly hypothetical questions of this sort
by observing how the political preferences of well-informed citizens differ from those of less-
informed citizens who are similar in politically relevant ways (Bartels 1990; along related lines
see Bartels 1996; Delli Carpini and Keeter 1996; Fishkin 1997; Gilens 2001). If well-informed
citizens have systematically different perceptions and preferences, the logic goes, might not
additional information move less-informed citizens in the same directions? In the present
context, if well-informed citizens seem to reason differently, draw on different premises, and
36
The sample mean value for the (
1 to +1) tax cut variable (excluding respondents who said they
“haven’t thought about” whether they favored or opposed it) is .352. Multiplying the sample mean value
for Own Tax Burden among these same respondents, .482, by the corresponding parameter estimate in the
fourth column of Table 4, .426, accounts for 58% of this net support for repealing the inheritance tax.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 48   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.