 |
Campaign Effects in Central Europe: Examples from Recent Elections
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
48
Table 3: Persuasive effects of public television exposure on vote choice via issue
attitude: relevant parameter estimates for eight cross-sectional data sets
Effect of Public tv exposure
Effect of Issue attitude
on Issue attitude
on Vote choice
beta
p
N
beta
p
N
Survey:
Romania, September 1996
-.01
.81
786
-.04
.49
786
Romania, October 1996
.08
.05
575
-.04
.57
575
Romania, September 2000
.04
.28
1948
.02
.32
1740
Romania, October 2000
.03
.62
1341
.06
.05
1258
Romania, November 2000
-.13
.08
1097
.05
.05
1015
Hungary, May 1994
.00
.92
1953
.03
.72
1616
Hungary, May 1998
.00
.96
1419
.13
.06
1414
Hungary, April 2002
.06
.14
1152
.01
.92
1115
Note: the parameter estimates in the table (standardized beta, two-tailed significance
level and the number of cases in the analysis) come from multivariate linear regression
models fitting into the more general path model displayed in Figure 2. For a further
discussion of model specifications and effects omitted from this table see the main text
and Figure 2.
|
| | Authors: Toka, Gabor. and Popescu, Marina. |
|
| |
|
|
48
Table 3: Persuasive effects of public television exposure on vote choice via issue
attitude: relevant parameter estimates for eight cross-sectional data sets
Effect of Public tv exposure
Effect of Issue attitude
on Issue attitude
on Vote choice
beta
p
N
beta
p
N
Survey:
Romania, September 1996
-.01
.81
786
-.04
.49
786
Romania, October 1996
.08
.05
575
-.04
.57
575
Romania, September 2000
.04
.28
1948
.02
.32
1740
Romania, October 2000
.03
.62
1341
.06
.05
1258
Romania, November 2000
-.13
.08
1097
.05
.05
1015
Hungary, May 1994
.00
.92
1953
.03
.72
1616
Hungary, May 1998
.00
.96
1419
.13
.06
1414
Hungary, April 2002
.06
.14
1152
.01
.92
1115
Note: the parameter estimates in the table (standardized beta, two-tailed significance
level and the number of cases in the analysis) come from multivariate linear regression
models fitting into the more general path model displayed in Figure 2. For a further
discussion of model specifications and effects omitted from this table see the main text
and Figure 2.
|
|
 Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
