Citation

Get-Out-the-Vote Drives and Turnout

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Most of the recent literature that investigates turnout and voter mobilization finds little or no impact on turnout as a result of get-out-the-vote phone drives. This paper describes two field experiments embedded within get-out-the-vote phone drives conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area in November 2002, both of which focused on new registrants. One of the drives was explicitly partisan (Democratic), and the other was strictly non-partisan. These experiments were designed to investigate whether get-out-the-vote phone drives are effective tools for increasing turnout. The partisan get-out-the-vote phone calls had no detectable effect on voter turnout. There was a positive effect on turnout from non-partisan calls, but it was only effective on Democratic registrants, and then only when the caller was representing a local organization, rather than a national one. The overall results raise continued questions about the efficacy of registration movements. The surprising finding regarding new Democratic registrants may provide insight on different dimensions of voters’ party identification worthy of future research.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

vote (96), turnout (64), treatment (59), democrat (57), registr (51), group (49), berkeley (48), partisan (48), voter (45), polit (43), effect (43), call (39), youth (37), mobil (37), drive (33), p (32), one (32), elect (32), non (30), experi (30), new (29),

Author's Keywords:

turnout, mobilization, partisan, non-partisan, partisanship, experiment, field experiment, registration, voter, voting, vote, treatment, control, regression, coefficient, logit, two-stage, 2002 general election, San Francisco Bay Area, Alameda County, Berkeley, Youth Vote
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62456_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

McNulty, John. "Get-Out-the-Vote Drives and Turnout" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 30, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62456_index.html>

APA Citation:

McNulty, J. , 2003-08-30 "Get-Out-the-Vote Drives and Turnout" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62456_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Most of the recent literature that investigates turnout and voter mobilization finds little or no impact on turnout as a result of get-out-the-vote phone drives. This paper describes two field experiments embedded within get-out-the-vote phone drives conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area in November 2002, both of which focused on new registrants. One of the drives was explicitly partisan (Democratic), and the other was strictly non-partisan. These experiments were designed to investigate whether get-out-the-vote phone drives are effective tools for increasing turnout. The partisan get-out-the-vote phone calls had no detectable effect on voter turnout. There was a positive effect on turnout from non-partisan calls, but it was only effective on Democratic registrants, and then only when the caller was representing a local organization, rather than a national one. The overall results raise continued questions about the efficacy of registration movements. The surprising finding regarding new Democratic registrants may provide insight on different dimensions of voters’ party identification worthy of future research.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 28
Word count: 7416
Text sample:
GET-OUT-THE-VOTE DRIVES AND TURNOUT John E. McNulty mcnulty@socrates.berkeley.edu Department of Political Science University of California Berkeley ABSTRACT: Most of the recent literature that investigates turnout and voter mobilization finds little or no impact on turnout as a result of get-out-the-vote phone drives. This paper describes two field experiments embedded within get-out-the-vote phone drives conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area in November 2002 both of which focused on new registrants. One of the drives was explicitly partisan (Democratic) and
Benjamin. 1994. “Turnout and the Democratic Vote.” American Politics Quarterly 22: 259-76. Ranney Austin. 1983. Channels of Power. New York: Basic Books. Rosenstone Steven J. and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan. Schattschneider E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. Tucker Harvey J. and Arnold Vedlitz. 1986. “Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections?” American Political Science Review 87:


Similar Titles:
Who Can be Mobilized? Attributing Differential Treatment Effects by Group in a Field Experiment of Turnout

Move to the Center or Mobilize the Base? Effects of Political Competition, Voter Turnout, and Partisan Loyalties on the Ideological Convergence of Vote-Maximizing Candidates in Two-Party Competition

Turnout, Registration, and Voter Mobilization Effects in the 2004 Presidential Election


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.